Close this search box.

Understanding the Complexities of Innovation for Gaining a Competitive Edge in the Digital Age

There was a time when product cycles could be easily segregated in terms of distinct stages from Conception to Obsolescence that enabled top/senior management to strategize on a long-term basis with the benefit of ‘slack time’ that allowed for ‘reflective pause’ on honest missteps and resolute course corrections without jeopardizing the organizational integrity.

There was a time when product cycles could be easily segregated in terms of distinct stages from Conception to Obsolescence that enabled top/senior management to strategize on a long-term basis with the benefit of ‘slack time’ that allowed for ‘reflective pause’ on honest missteps and resolute course corrections without jeopardizing the organizational integrity.  However, this is no longer the case as the demands and expectations of consumers have significantly changed with the rise of the Digitally-driven comforts.  Conception is not restricted to a ‘singular’ idea and has been forced into ‘ecosystem’ thinking.  Obsolescence has also undergone radical interpretation from being ‘end of useful life’ to ‘end of relevance’ in terms of rapidly evolving consumer needs and expectations.  All the stages in between the two extremities have also had new interpretations and the overall time to reach Obsolescence has been reduced drastically.  This has also impacted the services sector where online and, especially, mobile-driven commerce is changing the familiar landscape of several industries.  Consequently, innovation has become the ‘elixir’ for survival in the Digital Age.  It permeates the whole fabric of a progressive organization that wants to stay relevant and competitive in an increasingly unforgiving marketplace prone to punishing complacency with oblivion.

One of the exacerbating factors in promoting divergent employee relations has been the pervasive use of tech-enabled metrics in analyzing the efficiency and effectiveness of performance parameters.  Executive decisions are increasingly being subservient to the dazzling displays of HR Dashboards without heeding the ‘human story’ that results in unfulfilled expectations.  Another aspect is the undulating economic environment that has resulted in a large pool of qualified applicants for limited positions who are subjected to the indifferent categorization and filtration of Applicant Tracking System (ATS) software.  Even more entrenched issue is the convenience of an online Performance Management System and its impact on relevant Training & Development activities and the associated Succession Planning initiatives.  As a result, career progression of promising talent is precariously susceptible to stagnation and/or banishment to corporate wilderness based upon a tired, vengeful, pressured and/or hurried supervisor’s completion of the web-based performance appraisal form pertaining to an unsuspecting team member.  While reparations may be made later; the damage done to the morale and motivation has a lingering detrimental impact on the Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB).  Consequently, the perilous allure of embracing such technological solutions as a competitive advantage, without conducting the necessary due-diligence on their optimal use has increasingly fuelled the infatuation with corporate profits at the expense of marginalizing the innovative capability of the human capital present within the organization.

On the other hand, the dreaded prospect of running out of ideas/options to overcome critical issues is not a daunting challenge for capable leaders due to their knack for creating/facilitating a vibrant culture of innovation that embraces viable solutions from all levels of the organization.  Such an approach provides safeguards against the increasing incidences of disruptive innovations that are contributing to the shortening of the ‘lifecycle of excellence’ as customers/clients continue to exhibit voracious appetites for emerging tech-driven solutions that marginalize existing states of comfort and open the paths to new levels of nirvana.  It also helps to overcome the ‘magnitude of silence’ reigning over inquisitive minds that have been stripped of their ability/courage to ask probing questions, as an effective mechanism for germinating progressive thinking and harvesting of feasible solutions, in a stifling management system.

However, care much be taken not to confuse innovation with the strides in technology.  Innovation is a cardinal ‘humanistic’ concept that refers to astute application of human ingenuity, whereas, technology is a consequential ‘mechanistic’ tool that enables the efficient accomplishment of targeted tasks/assignments/responsibilities.  Keeping the ‘human factor’ in prime position while charting the course of a prosperous future in the Digital Age ensures the effective utilization of human capital in congruence with the optimal technological solutions, especially, since innovation is often hijacked by technology posing as its flag-bearer.  It is prudent to remember the following equations in the respective context:

Being future savvy in a Digital World requires visionary leadership that is unfazed by current challenges and has the fortitude to take profoundly astute, inherently unpopular, staggeringly transformational, and emotionally draining decisions that are prone to resistance from less enlightened quarters of the organization.  It demands the channelization of the innate ‘surviving and thriving’ animalistic instinct within the disciplined ingenuity of a thinking human mind.

Consequently, one of the key aspects of strategic review within progressive organizations should be the ascertainment of whether there is an inherent inclination for the ‘need to change’ or the ‘want to change’ approach to stay relevant in the Digital World.  The first one reflects a reactive approach and is a clear signal for course correction before being marginalized by more astute competitors.  The second one indicates a proactive approach that signifies a hearty embrace of timely innovation practices for assuring an organization’s competitive future with a robust ‘going concern’ status.

Innovation can be impeded in organizations due to a variety of reasons that may be controllable or uncontrollable.  These can be categorized as:

  • Individual

Nagging Doubts, Unnerving Apprehensions, Lack of Skill, Underutilization, Peer/Union Pressure, Machiavellian Mindset, etc.

  • Team

Personality Clashes, Conflicting Priorities, Skill Variation, Unclear focus, Multigenerational Work Differences, Diversity & Inclusion Issues, etc.

  • Department/Division/Function

Regional/Global Dispersion, Communication Gaps, Overlapping Responsibilities, Legacy Technology Constraints, Silo Mentality, Rampant Nepotism, Outdated/Inefficient Processes, etc.

  • Organization

Size/Spread, Strategic Misalignment, Key Stakeholder Interference (Board, Shareholder, etc.), Dominancy Failings (Monopoly, Duopoly, Oligarchy, etc.), Spiraling Costs, Past Successes, Corrosive Organizational Politics, Leadership Succession Tussles, etc.

  • Outside Influences

Restrictive Laws/Regulations, Disruptive Competitors, Political Interference, Activist Uprisings, Import Restrictions, Contentious Litigation, Fractured/Failed Partnerships, etc.

The aforementioned constraints can be countered by leveraging powerful drivers, e.g., Effective, Timely and Robust Corrective/Preventive Actions, Dynamic Management Systems, Extravagant Creativity, Unbridled Imagination, Astounding Visualization, Astute Know-How, Positive Mindset, Unwavering Ambition, Dogged Determination, Robust Resilience, Engaging Motivation, Synergistic Partnerships, Calm Disposition, Prudent Negotiation, Shared Values Reinforcement, Resource Rationalization, Invigorating Talent Management, Fair and Transparent Functionality, Impartial Accountability, etc.

The path to sustainable success, formidable competitiveness and continued relevance in a rapidly evolving Digital World is paved by ‘Productive Rebels’, rather than, ‘Insular Conformists’, therefore, Talent Management Practices need to have the ‘Breathing Space’ for ‘Free Thinkers’ and ‘Trendsetters’ who are imbued with the ‘Change Imperative’ and enrich the ‘Organizational Aptitude’ in unconventional ways that boosts the ‘Core Value of Innovation’ effectively.  This can be facilitated by inculcating a sense of ‘customized ownership (focused on internalizing the rationale for achievement)’ and ‘personal investment (focused on triggering maximizing engagement) to galvanize the workforce for achieving demanding goals.  Are you ready to take up the challenge?

Read more

Latest News

Read More

How to stop loneliness at work in its tracks

13 June 2024


Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

The University of Edinburgh – CMVM/Institute of Genetics and CancerSalary: £32,982 to £38,205 per annum (Grade 6)

Collaborate closely with service directors, heads of service, and senior managers to drive transformation initiatives. Job Types: Full-time, Permanent. £54,446 – £57,401 a yearFrom Indeed

The HR function follows the typical operating model of strategy, expert services, people development, business partnering, recruitment and operations. £75,000 a yearFrom Civil Service –

Reporting to the Chief People Officer, you will oversee the full employee lifecycle, ensuring the delivery of HR activities that attract, retain, and develop…From PA

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE