Close this search box.

New equality laws

On 1 January 2024, amendments to the Equality Act 2010 came into force. These amendments preserve, and in some cases, extend, a number of employment rights which would otherwise have ceased to be effective at the end of 2023 by virtue of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL).

The amendments are summarised as follows:

Removal of requirement for same employer with equal pay claims

Under the Equality Act, in order to bring an equal pay claim, employees needed to demonstrate that they were paid less than a colleague employed by the same, or an associated employer. This is in contrast to the favoured EU approach which only requires that terms and conditions are derived from a ‘single source’. This EU approach has now been built into the Equality Act, with the effect that an employee may potentially compare pay with employees from different organisations.

In practical terms, however, this is unlikely to lead to any real change as the UK courts and tribunals have been using the ‘single source’ test for some time, due to the requirement to interpret UK law in line with rights provided under EU treaties.

Expansion of definition of disability

The Equality Act defines a disability as a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on a person’s ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The concept of normal day-to-day activities has now been expanded to include a person’s ability to ‘participate fully and effectively in working life on an equal basis to other workers’, which essentially widens the definition to cover infrequent work activities, as well as activities common in certain types of employment. For example, work-related activities such as taking career-related examinations and assessments, may now fall under the definition of normal day-to-day activities, and activities such as lifting and moving heavy goods, which is uncommon in most jobs but relevant to some, may also be covered. Again, the practical impact of this change is likely to be limited as the wider definition has already been adopted in the UK in some cases, and this simply restates the position under UK law.

No need to share a protected characteristic when claiming indirect discrimination

In the case of indirect discrimination claims, a claimant was previously required to share the same protected characteristic as the disadvantaged group. This has now changed to fall in line with a European Court of Justice decision which held that such a claim may be brought by a person who does not share the same protected characteristic.

In this case, Roma people had been disadvantaged by electricity meters in their area being fitted at a height that was more difficult for them to access, which had been done to prevent such meters being interfered with. A resident of that area, who was not of Roma ethnic origin, succeeded with an argument that she had been indirectly discriminated against as it was a disadvantage for her as well, despite her not having the protected characteristic.

This change to the Equality Act opens up the possibility for new claims to be raised which could not have succeeded before. For example, only women with childcare responsibilities who were not permitted to work part-time could have succeeded with indirect discrimination claims, whereas now this has changed, and men who are also refused part-time work can potentially make such a claim, as they are suffering the same disadvantage as the disadvantaged group (ie women with childcare responsibilities), without actually falling within it.

Source: Lexology

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Revolutionising HR: How Augmented Analytics and AI are Transforming Workforce Management – ARTICLE FROM ISSUE 236 – JUNE 2024

19 June 2024


Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Oxford – Department of Politics and International RelationsSalary: £36,024 to £44,263 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas

Jackson Hogg are delighted to be exclusively supporting an established manufacturing client based in Sunderland with the appointment of a Head of HR. £48,000 –

The HR Director (HRD) will be a key member of the UK senior management team, driving the business forwards through being accountable for the attraction,

The HR Director (HRD) will be a key member of the UK senior management team, driving the business forwards through being accountable for the attraction,

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE