Legal secretary wins sexual harassment claim after Tribunal rules owner’s remarks were not banter

In the case of Miss M B v JGQC Solicitors Limited a legal secretary has successfully won her sexual harassment case against a law firm where the owner was humorously labelled a “sexual predator” by a colleague.

In the case of Miss M B v A Solicitors a legal secretary has successfully won her sexual harassment case against a law firm where the owner was humorously labelled a “sexual predator” by a colleague.

An employment tribunal dismissed the claim that some incidents Miss MB reported at at the firm were merely office banter.

“Flippant or light-hearted comments can constitute harassment just as much as those made aggressively,” the tribunal clarified.

The tribunal was also highly critical of the comments made about Miss MB in the evidence given by staff.

The ruling highlighted how one witness launched a “personal attack on Miss MB with comments about her shocking state of attire on social media, accusing her of flaunting herself and dressing for the office as if she were going to a night out, offensively comparing her to a ‘Love Island reject.’”

The tribunal was troubled by the argument that Miss MB’s choice of dress or social media posts meant she couldn’t possibly be offended or made uncomfortable by Mr. H’s actions.

Their statements were seen as indicative of the workplace environment Miss MB faced, surrounded by staff who had known Mr. H for many years.

The tribunal emphasized that Mr. H’s actions did not need to have a sexual motivation to qualify as sexual harassment.

The tribunal remarked, “It must have been evident to Miss MB that this group had worked together for a long time, were comfortable discussing personal lives in detail, and used language they did not find inappropriate. It is reasonable for the claimant to have not considered it a safe space to express her discomfort.”

“It is too easy for things to be dismissed as ‘banter’ or jokes, but this cannot be right. It is immaterial whether the conduct is acceptable to others or common in the workplace.”

Her grievance was not investigated impartially, with those conducting it being “very protective” of Mr. H and dismissive of her allegations.

The tribunal determined that the conduct met the legal definition of sexual harassment, creating an offensive and arguably intimidating environment.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

10 Essential Strategies for Leaders Handling Redundancy Announcements

26 July 2025

Future of HR

26 July 2025

Despite flexible policies, nearly 4 in 10 still feel guilty being offline...

Management

25 July 2025

It’s better for everyone if employees use their initiative. Better for line managers who are not dragged into micro managing. Better for the individual who...

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Natural Environment Research Council – NERC – Research and Skill Directorate (Discovery Team)Salary: £36,650 per annum. UKRI Band D This provides summary information and comment

Scholars School SystemSalary: £45,000 to £50,000 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are

University of Sussex – Human Resources Salary: £25,733 to £29,179. Grade 4, per annum, pro rata if part time This provides summary information and comment

University of CambridgeSalary: £12,109 pa (based on FTE £28,381pa) plus pension and benefits This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE