Employers can be liable for detriment where whistle blowing part of ‘collective memory’

The EAT has upheld a tribunal decision that an employer was liable for whistleblowing detriment and victimisation where an employee was treated unfairly during a disciplinary process by a decision-maker who had been influenced by a prejudicial ‘collective memory’ of the individual as a troublemaker, even though the decision-maker had no personal knowledge of the employee’s complaints made several years earlier.

The EAT has upheld a tribunal decision that an employer was liable for whistleblowing detriment and victimisation where an employee was treated unfairly during a disciplinary process by a decision-maker who had been influenced by a prejudicial ‘collective memory’ of the individual as a troublemaker, even though the decision-maker had no personal knowledge of the employee’s complaints made several years earlier.

Whether a detriment was inflicted ‘on the ground that’ a claimant made a protected disclosure or ‘because’ he did a protected act is ultimately a factual determination for the tribunal to make and the EAT considered it unnecessary to try and fit the facts into one of the types of case covered by previous authorities (e.g., imposing liability due to manipulation of a decision-maker or tainted information).

In First Greater Western Ltd v Moussa a general management culture of hostility towards the claimant, tagging him as an ‘agitator’ and ‘malign influence’, had influenced the decision-maker himself and also permeated the approach of the HR department in its advice to him.

It was not necessary for there to be identified individual decision-makers who knew and were motivated by the protected complaints, as the influence on the decision-maker could be attributed to the employer generally and the employer could be (and was) directly liable.

Pending any further appeal, the case highlights the importance of management and HR understanding the need not to allow a culture of hostility to whistleblowers, or those submitting grievances, to develop.

 

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Workforce classification: ‘A silent risk with loud consequences’

    3 December 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    Durham University – Human ResourcesSalary: £24,044 to £25,433 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court

    University of St Andrews – Human ResourcesSalary: £37,999 to £45,163 per annum. This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment

    Our Client, a renowned, global financial services company based in the City of London are looking for a Head of HR to join their team

    Are you passionate about HR and eager to grow your career in a progressive, local organisation? If you have relevant experience, your CIPD Level 3

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE