Search
Close this search box.

Admin assistant awarded £15,000 in compensation for unfair dismissal after falling pregnant

n the case of Miss C Leitch v CIS Services Limited Charlotte Leitch joined the firm, which designs, installs and maintains customer information and security systems in the rail industry, as an administrative assistant on May 21, 2021.

In the case of Miss C Leitch v CIS Services Limited Charlotte Leitch joined the firm, which designs, installs and maintains customer information and security systems in the rail industry, as an administrative assistant on May 21, 2021.

On Wednesday, June 23, Ms Leitch – who had yet to complete and sign her contract – told her supervisor she was unable to work because she needed to attend hospital as she was pregnant.

The next day, the firm’s head of compliance Nicola Calder held an informal meeting with Ms Leitch, who explained she previously had miscarriages and was not sure if this pregnancy would be successful.

Ms Calder then informed the claimant that she had not signed her contract of employment and so “we have no obligation to keep you on,” the tribunal heard.

After taking legal advice, Ms Leitch sent an email stating: “An email sent from Nicola suggests that I volunteered to leave due to a previous traumatic experience. This is not the case and by revealing to Nicola my previous miscarriage, had this used against me. I find this extremely disrespectful to use my grief as a potential get out of keeping me under the company’s employment.

“I agreed to leave as I felt pressurised to do so and felt that I had no rights to argue.”

The company claimed the decision was made “irrespective” of Ms Leitch being pregnant and “categorically” denied discrimination.

In defence, CIS Services pointed to another pregnant employee, a bookkeeper, who had been retained after returning from maternity leave.

However, a judge found the claims against the firm were “well-founded” and ordered the company to pay Ms Leitch £14,884.90

In their ruling, the judge said: “Suddenly without warning on June 24, 2021, the claimant was without a job. She felt worthless, she was worried about the effect on her unborn child. The claimant was hurt and distressed by the decision to dismiss.”

Read more

Latest News

Read More

AI in the workplace: time to ‘get in the game or watch from the side-lines’

22 February 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Sue Ross Legal are supporting a leading, Sheffield based law firm who have a unique opportunity for a talented and experienced Employment Solicitor or Legal…From

Andy File Associates Limited is working as a Recruitment Agency on behalf of our client with regards this permanent position.*. Who are they looking for*.

Head of Employment and HR Services. We have a unique opportunity for a talented and experienced Employment Solicitor or Legal Executive to head up our…From

Stantec UK & Ireland (UK&I) is a rapidly growing business, through acquisitions and organic growth. Reporting to the HR Director UKI, you will lead a

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE