In Mrs J A Healey v Lancashire County Council Mrs Healey was employed by Lancashire council in its schools improvement service as an early years’ specialist. She is a qualified teacher. In November 2014, Mrs Healey was diagnosed with cancer. She needed to take long periods of sickness absence so that her cancer could be treated. She was absent from work for the whole of 2015 when she endured operations and a strong course of chemotherapy. She returned to work in May 2016. Unfortunately, in 2017 it was discovered that the cancer had returned and she required more treatment. She was again absent due to sickness relating to cancer which continued until early 2019.
In 2018 the council undertook a restructure of its early years team. Mrs Healey was unhappy with the outcome of this restructure as it affected her. She believes that she was treated unfairly and discriminated against. Mrs Healey was let go from her role at the authority after refusing to accept a new position in the restructuring process. She was in remission at this point.
The court found that the dismissal was in breach of the Equality Act 2010 – discrimination arising from disability – and stated she had been ‘unfairly dismissed’. Judge Leach said this was due to requiring Mrs Healey to apply and be interviewed – in competition with a colleague – for a role ‘substantially the same as her own’ which she had carried out since 2012. He said that the new role was “almost identical” to her old job, and ruled that “she should have been provided” with the new role by default. The court found that the competitive interview process amounted to unfavourable treatment due to her long absence from work and cancer treatment.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.