Royal Mail ordered to pay £100,000 to whistle-blower after unfair dismissal and bullying

In the case of Ms K Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Ltd Royal Mail has been ordered to pay a recommended sum of more than £100,000 to an employee due to bullying and unfair dismissal after she blew the whistle on potential fraudulent activity relating to bonuses.

In the case of Ms K Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Ltd Royal Mail has been ordered to pay a recommended sum of more than £100,000 to an employee due to bullying and unfair dismissal after she blew the whistle on potential fraudulent activity relating to bonuses.

Kam Jhuti alleged a long-running bullying campaign by her boss, after she raised concerns that a colleague she was shadowing was not following Ofcom guidance, and was breaching the business’ bonus policy. This then resulted in unfair dismissal.

The employment tribunal confirmed that Jhuti was bullied, harrassed and intimidated by the superior to whom she reported her concerns, and who appeared to also benefit from the potential fraud. Evidence was heard that Jhuti had suffered severe depression and post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of her treatment, which included anxiety and regular panic attacks, and ultimately contributed to a breakdown in her relationship with her daughter, among other issues.

The judgement stated: “The impact of the campaign of bullying, intimidation and harassment by Mr Widmer in this case has undoubtedly been profound…While, as a rule, we try to avoid language which might be deemed intemperate, it is nonetheless true to say that the respondent’s treatment of the claimant has destroyed the claimant’s life. Furthermore, all of the medical professionals are clear that the resolution of these employment tribunal proceedings is necessary as a prerequisite to the claimant beginning to make any sort of recovery.”

A Royal Mail spokesperson said: “Royal Mail has a zero-tolerance approach to bullying, harassment or discrimination of any kind. We value the work and commitment of all individuals who work in our business. This is a long-running case that relates to matters arising a number of years ago. We are now reviewing this decision. It would not be appropriate

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Guide to data-driven approach to optimising benefits

1 August 2025

Leadership

1 August 2025

Meaning you’re being over cautious the consequences of this not working are not almost certain death more likely just a dent in your reputation (for...

Corporate Social Responsibility

31 July 2025

Organisations that are attuned to the world around them will use CSR to align company values with direct societal needs....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of YorkSalary: Competitive remuneration and benefits This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases

University of East London – Strategic Development and Delivery directorate Salary: From £52,307 inclusive of London Weighting This provides summary information and comment on the

Queen Mary University of London – IT Services DirectorateSalary: £54,617 to £60,901 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

University of Sussex – Human Resources Salary: £25,733 to £29,179. Grade 4, per annum, pro rata if part time This provides summary information and comment

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE