Search
Close this search box.

Cleaner wins unfair dismissal claim after making protected disclosures about working conditions

In Mr P Hernandez v Swiftclean Ltd Mr Hernandez was employed by Swiftclean Ltd as a cleaning operative from 4 September 2018 until his dismissal (with effect from 21 September 2020). At the time of his dismissal, he earned £9 per hour and worked 48 hours per week. He was dismissed on grounds of poor performance but claimed not to have been warned about poor performance prior to his dismissal and maintains that no process was followed in dismissing him.

In Mr P Hernandez v Swiftclean Ltd Mr Hernandez was employed by Swiftclean Ltd as a cleaning operative from 4 September 2018 until his dismissal (with effect from 21 September 2020). At the time of his dismissal, he earned £9 per hour and worked 48 hours per week. He was dismissed on grounds of poor performance but claimed not to have been warned about poor performance prior to his dismissal and maintains that no process was followed in dismissing him.

On 23 January 2020, he and two colleagues raised a protected disclosure via their trade union representative, in which they raised concerns about, amongst other things, being pressured to work extra time, being provided with inadequate equipment, being required to drive a car with expired insurance, and not being given gloves to use when cleaning toilets. They raised a further protected disclosure about the lack of appropriate information or training in respect of the COVID-19 pandemic and a failure to provide adequate personal protective equipment.

The tribunal found that Hernandez was not shown any of the client complaints that allegedly led to his dismissal, nor was any process followed in dismissing him.

Employment Judge Smeaton said the real reason for Hernandez’s dismissal was because his employer was “annoyed he had raised protected disclosures and used his trade union in order to do so and was punishing him as a result”.

The tribunal ruled that Hernandez’s claims of unfair and automatic unfair dismissal were well-founded, as was his claim of unlawful detriment.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

How to avoid employee disengagement in the age of AI

25 April 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

The Bedford College GroupSalary £26 000 pa from depending on experience This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered Where employment tribunal

London School of Hygiene amp Tropical Medicine 8211 DirectorateSalary £33 111 to £37 298 per annum inclusive This provides summary information and comment on the

The purpose of the role will be to provide a comprehensive HR service for approximately 600 staff within the Trust 50 off Endeavour Children s

Working closely with the leadership team the interim Head of HR and OD will help lead the organisation through a period of change and lead

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE