In Ms V Lindsay v Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) a bank worker has been awarded £22,000 after her boss rang her while she was off sick to ask her not to post pictures of cakes on Facebook.
Victoria Lindsay, who has PTSD, was signed off with severe anxiety but continued to experience distress due to regular check-up calls from the manager, a tribunal heard.
The HBOS manager – named only as Ms Jallow in the tribunal’s ruling, unreasonably questioned themortgage adviser’s medication and without any justification insisted she ask her doctor for a review of it.
When Victoria, who had a cake-making business, took a family holiday, just a day into the trip Jallow then called her to tell her to “be mindful” about posting pictures of cakes she baked on Facebook – but Victoria said it was a hobby which was “therapeutic”.
The call on December 17 last year caused Victoria such distress she suffered a 30-minute panic attack in front of her kids and resigned.
Judge Amanda Jones, sitting at Glasgow employment tribunal, ruled Jallow had no reason to call on December 17 and it contributed to her already increasingly anxious state. The hearing was told Victoria, who has had PTSD since 2016, suffered a panic attack last year following a significant family issue and went off sick. She was increasingly worried about a return and was “filled with fear”.
The tribunal said: “Colleagues at the Hamilton branch had reacted negatively to a post made by Victoria regarding cakes made by her during her absence from work.
“Ms Jallow told her that senior management had brought to her attention her social media presence regarding the cake-making business.
“Ms Lindsay said that the distress caused to her was horrific. She had permission to engage in her cake-making business, which she operated as a hobby and was therapeutic for dealing with her anxiety.
“There was nothing blameworthy about her conduct.”
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.