Search
Close this search box.

Salesperson wins sex discrimination claim

In the case of Stannard v Overseas Courier Service Mrs S Stannard was found to have been constructively dismissed. She was employed as a salesperson at a courier firm and was subjected to ‘demeaning’ and explicit sexual comments.

In the case of Stannard v Overseas Courier Service Mrs S Stannard was found to have been constructively dismissed. She was employed as a salesperson at a courier firm and was subjected to ‘demeaning’ and explicit sexual comments.

The company was a male dominated organisation at senior level. Stannard says that a sexist culture existed which was reflected by the inappropriate comments that were often made to her and other women. Throughout her employment which began when she was 22 years old, male colleagues regularly made comments about her appearance. The comments were of a type that were not made to male colleagues; the type of comments made were on the length of her legs, how tall she was, and the size of her breasts during pregnancy.

When she informed the company directors of her pregnancy, one allegedly joked that she should take back her comment so that he could make her redundant.

In 2017, Stannard suffered a slipped disc and was off work for three weeks. Upon returning, she needed to attend physiotherapy sessions during her work hours. Her work came under scrutiny at this point, with the company directors claiming that she needed to work additional hours to make up the physiotherapy time and work in the office on Fridays, rather than at home as she had been doing to several years. She said that after her injury there was a “step change” in the way she was treated at the firm.

She told the tribunal: “the amount of times the directors shouted at me during the last few months of my working for the business and reduced me to tears was extraordinary.”

The ET found many of the comments directed at the claimant during her time at the firm were at times “insulting, other times lascivious, other times attempts at humour but always demeaning and unwanted”.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Myths surrounding AI in the recruitment industry busted

24 April 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of NorthamptonSalary: £44,263 to £54,395 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court

HR Director – Interim – 9 month FTC – London – Hybrid – £100,000 – £120,000 A dynamic, global financial services business with offices based

University of Bristol – Human ResourcesSalary: £26,444 to £29,605 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Queen Mary University of London – Human ResourcesSalary: £31,421 to £38,165 per annum inclusive of London Allowance This provides summary information and comment on the

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE