Sainsbury’s worker wins unfair dismissal case in race row

In the case of Cunnington v Sainsburys Mrs Cunnington had worked for Sainsburys for 28 years. On the day of the incident Mrs Cunnington was working a morning shift with a long-term work colleague. She picked up a cuddly toy, a black rabbit named Bing.

In the case of Cunnington v Sainsburys Mrs Cunnington had worked for Sainsburys for 28 years. On the day of the incident Mrs Cunnington was working a morning shift with a long-term work colleague. She picked up a cuddly toy, a black rabbit named Bing.

She then told a tribunal that she had asked colleagues: “Should we really be selling this toy? Black Lives Matter.” In her evidence, Ms Cunnington said she felt that the toy could be offensive to black people in the same way as the banned Golly mascot for Robertson’s jam.

Ms Cunnington was dismissed for gross misconduct after a colleague alleged the comment she made was racist.

But a tribunal in Birmingham ruled in June the former price controller was unfairly sacked.

The judge said “sensitivities were heightened at the time of the incident”, which took place two weeks after George Floyd, an unarmed black man, was murdered by white police officer Derek Chauvin in the US, sparking worldwide protests over racial inequality.

The judge’s ruling added “It is all the more reason to take great care that proper procedures are followed thoroughly, objectively and fairly so that justice can be done.

“Given the size and resources of [Sainsbury’s], the fact that so many fundamental procedural errors were made is unacceptable… the process followed was a disservice to [Ms Cunnington] and also to [Sainsbury’s] cause to being an inclusive employer.

“In summary the decision to dismiss was not well founded and is unfair.”

Read more

Latest News

Read More

What parenting teaches us about professional growth

15 August 2025

Employee Benefits & Reward

14 August 2025

In the race to attract and retain top talent, HR leaders are constantly reassessing how to create a compelling employee value proposition that aligns with...

Employment Law

14 August 2025

Step-by-step guide for UK employers to prepare for an employment tribunal. Learn ET1/ET3 tips, witness prep, and settlement strategies....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £33,951 to £39,906 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

University of Oxford – HR Centres of Excellence based within the Centre for Human GeneticsSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata). Grade 6 This

University of Bradford – Directorate of People and CultureSalary: £40,497 to £45,413 per annum Role 1 – 1 FTE September to end of January 2026.

University of Greater Manchester – Human Resources TeamSalary: £41,671 to £48,149 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE