Employee wins appeal against unfair health and safety dismissal

In the case of Sinclair v Trackwork Limited, Sinclair was employed by Trackwork and tasked with implementing a new safety procedure. Trackwork did not inform its other employees about Sinclair’s mandate to do this, and they raised concerns about what he was trying to do. In particular, they complained about his ‘overcautious and somewhat zealous’ approach.
corporate

In the case of Sinclair v Trackwork Limited, Sinclair was employed by Trackwork and tasked with implementing a new safety procedure. Trackwork did not inform its other employees about Sinclair’s mandate to do this, and they raised concerns about what he was trying to do. In particular, they complained about his ‘overcautious and somewhat zealous’ approach.

He was subsequently dismissed for the ‘upset and friction’ that his activities had caused. Sinclair claimed that he had been automatically unfairly dismissed.

He was unsuccessful at first instance with the employment tribunal finding the reason for dismissal was the fact that a loyal workforce had become demoralised by the way in which he was managing health and safety i.e. it was his methodology, rather than his designated health and safety activities, that caused his dismissal.

The EAT, however, disagreed stating that, “the souring of relations, or the over-zealous manner in which the Claimant carried out his duties, are not matters which can be said to be properly separable from the carrying-out of those activities.” As such the EAT accepted that the employee had been dismissed because of his responsibility for health and safety matters. In reaching this decision the EAT placed weight on, “the fact that carrying out such activities will often be resisted, or regarded as unwelcome, by other colleagues,” and that this was one purpose of the protection provided by legislation.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

How to effectively manage multigenerational workforces

11 July 2025

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Durham University – Human Resources Salary: Competitive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases

Sheffield Hallam University – Directorate of Human Resources and Organisational Development Salary: £39,355 to £44,128 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the

University of Cambridge – Human Resources DivisionSalary: £41,671 to £55,755 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment

University of Oxford – Harris Manchester CollegeSalary: £28,889 to £33,453 (FTE equivalent: £48,149–£55,755), inc. Oxford University weighting of £900 (FTE equivalent: £1,500) This provides summary

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE