Employee with severe asthma wins appeal against unfair dismissal

In Brightman v TIAA Ltd Mrs Brightman had severe asthma and other conditions that meant she was disabled under the Equality Act. She had significant absences from work, despite adjustments to her working hours and type of work. These absences increased over time to around 35%. Her employer obtained medical evidence about her condition and decided that her absence levels were unlikely to improve and dismissed her for capability. Mrs Brightman claimed that the dismissal was unfair, disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

In Brightman v TIAA Ltd Mrs Brightman had severe asthma and other conditions that meant she was disabled under the Equality Act. She had significant absences from work, despite adjustments to her working hours and type of work. These absences increased over time to around 35%. Her employer obtained medical evidence about her condition and decided that her absence levels were unlikely to improve and dismissed her for capability. Mrs Brightman claimed that the dismissal was unfair, disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The employment tribunal dismissed her claims. It accepted that the dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses, relying on medical evidence that showed that Mrs Brightman’s health did not in fact improve. On that basis the employer could not have been expected to wait longer before taking the decision to dismiss. Mrs Brightman appealed.

The EAT allowed the appeal in relation to discrimination because of something arising in consequence of disability and a failure to make reasonable adjustments. In this case the tribunal had doubts about the adequacy of the medical information but had “filled the gap” with information about how Mrs Brightman’s medical condition had in fact progressed after the dismissal. That evidence was irrelevant to whether the employer had acted fairly in deciding to dismiss in the first place.

The unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims were sent back to a different employment tribunal for rehearing.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

What parenting teaches us about professional growth

15 August 2025

Employee Benefits & Reward

14 August 2025

In the race to attract and retain top talent, HR leaders are constantly reassessing how to create a compelling employee value proposition that aligns with...

Employment Law

14 August 2025

Step-by-step guide for UK employers to prepare for an employment tribunal. Learn ET1/ET3 tips, witness prep, and settlement strategies....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £33,951 to £39,906 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

University of Oxford – HR Centres of Excellence based within the Centre for Human GeneticsSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata). Grade 6 This

University of Bradford – Directorate of People and CultureSalary: £40,497 to £45,413 per annum Role 1 – 1 FTE September to end of January 2026.

University of Greater Manchester – Human Resources TeamSalary: £41,671 to £48,149 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE