Should barristers who commit sexual misconduct have more lenient sanctions

There have been calls for more lenient sanctions against barristers who commit sexual misconduct as some associates such as Inner Temple and Gray’s Inn said that a starting point of 12-months’ suspension for sexual misconduct was ‘disproportionate’ for less serious types of behaviour.

There have been calls for more lenient sanctions against barristers who commit sexual misconduct as some associates such as Inner Temple and Gray’s Inn said that a starting point of 12-months’ suspension for sexual misconduct was ‘disproportionate’ for less serious types of behaviour.

The official guidance on sanctions says that “inappropriate sexual conduct in a professional context” that doesn’t involve a criminal conviction should normally be punished by a fine or short suspension.

Compare that to a finding of dishonesty against a barrister: the starting point there is disbarment, unless there are “clear mitigating factors”. Sexual misconduct — even if punished with a criminal conviction — only attracts the same default sanction if it leads to jail time.

However, the Bar Tribunal and Adjudication Service (BTAS) said that ‘given the broad support for the proposed ranges’ it intends to retain the starting point of 12 months’ suspension for misconduct of a sexual nature, along with discrimination and harassment.

‘We recognise these bands cover a wide range of types of conduct, but we cannot agree that what is termed “low level” misconduct in some of the responses should attract lesser sanctions,’ it said.

‘Sanctions imposed by tribunals can only follow a finding of professional misconduct, which by definition means the proved misconduct was considered to be serious. If conduct falling within these groups has reached this stage of the disciplinary process, then our view remains that it should attract a serious sanction if public trust and confidence in the profession is to be maintained.’

Read more

Latest News

Read More

What parenting teaches us about professional growth

15 August 2025

Employee Benefits & Reward

14 August 2025

In the race to attract and retain top talent, HR leaders are constantly reassessing how to create a compelling employee value proposition that aligns with...

Employment Law

14 August 2025

Step-by-step guide for UK employers to prepare for an employment tribunal. Learn ET1/ET3 tips, witness prep, and settlement strategies....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £33,951 to £39,906 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

University of Oxford – HR Centres of Excellence based within the Centre for Human GeneticsSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata). Grade 6 This

University of Bradford – Directorate of People and CultureSalary: £40,497 to £45,413 per annum Role 1 – 1 FTE September to end of January 2026.

University of Greater Manchester – Human Resources TeamSalary: £41,671 to £48,149 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE