Should barristers who commit sexual misconduct have more lenient sanctions

There have been calls for more lenient sanctions against barristers who commit sexual misconduct as some associates such as Inner Temple and Gray’s Inn said that a starting point of 12-months’ suspension for sexual misconduct was ‘disproportionate’ for less serious types of behaviour.

There have been calls for more lenient sanctions against barristers who commit sexual misconduct as some associates such as Inner Temple and Gray’s Inn said that a starting point of 12-months’ suspension for sexual misconduct was ‘disproportionate’ for less serious types of behaviour.

The official guidance on sanctions says that “inappropriate sexual conduct in a professional context” that doesn’t involve a criminal conviction should normally be punished by a fine or short suspension.

Compare that to a finding of dishonesty against a barrister: the starting point there is disbarment, unless there are “clear mitigating factors”. Sexual misconduct — even if punished with a criminal conviction — only attracts the same default sanction if it leads to jail time.

However, the Bar Tribunal and Adjudication Service (BTAS) said that ‘given the broad support for the proposed ranges’ it intends to retain the starting point of 12 months’ suspension for misconduct of a sexual nature, along with discrimination and harassment.

‘We recognise these bands cover a wide range of types of conduct, but we cannot agree that what is termed “low level” misconduct in some of the responses should attract lesser sanctions,’ it said.

‘Sanctions imposed by tribunals can only follow a finding of professional misconduct, which by definition means the proved misconduct was considered to be serious. If conduct falling within these groups has reached this stage of the disciplinary process, then our view remains that it should attract a serious sanction if public trust and confidence in the profession is to be maintained.’

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Revealed – unbelievable real workplace safety fails

3 July 2025

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Queen Mary University of London – Health and Safety DirectorateSalary: £43,677 to £51,040 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas

University of Cambridge – Human Resources DivisionSalary: £33,482 to £39,355 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment

University of Cambridge – Department of PathologySalary: £35,116 to £45,413 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment

University of Exeter – PS ConnectSalary: The starting salary will be from £27,644 per annum pro rata on Grade D, depending on qualifications and experience.

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE