An ET is to be asked to decide whether veganism is a “philosophical belief” under S.10 of the Equality Act 2010 in a claim being brought by an ex-employee of the League Against Cruel Sports (LACS). The BBC report that Jordi Casamitjana says he was sacked by the LACS after disclosing it invested pension funds in firms involved in animal testing. Casamitjana says he is an “ethical” vegan as he cares about animals, the environment, and his health, so veganism is a belief affecting every single aspect of his life. The LACS say he was dismissed for gross misconduct, not because of veganism. Note that in CW v The UK, the EU Commission of Human Rights found that veganism falls within Article 9 of the Convention of Human Rights, the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and this finding relating to human rights is reflected in the EHRC’s guide to the law on religion and belief.
The updates are kindly provided by Simons Muirhead & Burton Law firm
This update provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and help judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for more information. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
