Pregnant workers must be provided with specified information to substantiate redundancy dismissal

The ECJ held that EU law does not prevent the dismissal of a pregnant worker in the context of a collective redundancy. While dismissal for reasons connected with the worker’s pregnancy would contravene EU law, dismissal for redundancy during the period from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of the maternity leave is not unlawful if the employer sets out in writing…
redundancy

In Porras Guisado v Bankia S.A., Fondo de Garantía Salarial, the ECJ held that EU law does not prevent the dismissal of a pregnant worker in the context of a collective redundancy. While dismissal for reasons connected with the worker’s pregnancy would contravene EU law, dismissal for redundancy during the period from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of the maternity leave is not unlawful if the employer sets out in writing: (i) the economic, technical or organisational reasons justifying the redundancy and (ii) the objective criteria chosen to identify the workers to be made redundant. Under S.92(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, pregnant employees and those on maternity leave are entitled to written reasons for dismissal regardless of length of service. Employers should ensure they comply with requirements (i) and (ii) in redundancy situations.


This update provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgements made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for more information.  Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

How can employers better support its LGBTQ+ workers

20 June 2025

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £41,671 to £55,755 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and

Queen Mary University of London – Human ResourcesSalary: £76,952 to £84,329 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

Queen Mary University of London – Human ResourcesSalary: £76,952 to £84,329 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Bath – Campus ServicesSalary: £30,805 to £37,174. Grade 6 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE