The Guardian reports that a firearms officer who guarded members of the royal family has been awarded £457,000 compensation after he was called “just a Paki” during years of racist abuse by fellow officers. PC Nadeem Saddique, claimed a sergeant confided in him that an inspector had told another officer: “I’ll get that black c**t out of firearms, watch.” The officer apparently agreed and allegedly replied: “Who does he think he is, he is just a Paki.” Saddique initially settled the race discrimination and victimisation claims without receiving any money on the understanding that he would be given access to training and would regain his VIP protection status when he returned to work. But a personal development plan had not been properly implemented, and his career came to a halt. At a subsequent remedy hearing, Saddique was awarded more than £457,000 in compensation, which took account of the fact that he is unable to return to work with the police.
Content
The aim of this update is to provide summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. In particular, where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented by the parties and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links provided to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for further details. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.