In Knight v Fairway & Kenwood Car Service the EAT held that a cab driver who could work as and when he pleased could not be classed an employee as there was no mutuality of obligation between the parties to provide work and carry out work. The written terms did not require a minimum or reasonable amount of work and there was no scope for inferring such an obligation from the fact that the Claimant in fact worked 7 days a week. This meant that there was no jurisdiction to hear a claim for wrongful dismissal.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.