Implying ‘playing the race card’ was discrimination

In Royal Bank of Scotland PLC v Morris the EAT agreed with a tribunal’s decision that a black employee, who complained about his manager’s conduct, suffered direct discrimination

In Royal Bank of Scotland PLC v Morris the EAT agreed with a tribunal’s decision that a black employee, who complained about his manager’s conduct, suffered direct discrimination when a senior manager commented without any factual basis that his complaint was about race discrimination. The comment was humiliating and based on a stereotypical assumption, and a white employee complaining about a black colleague would not have been treated in the same way.

Mr Morris is black and of African-Caribbean ethnic origin. He raised a complaint about his manager, Mr Tighe, to Mr Tighe’s manager, Mr Arnett. At a meeting, Mr Arnett, without any foundation said something to the effect that he understood Mr Morris to be alleging that Mr Tighe’s conduct towards him was connected with his race. Mr Morris denied that he had made any such allegation. He resented what he understood to be the suggestion that he was “playing the race card”. Mr Morris’ subsequent grievance about Mr Tighe and Mr Arnett was dismissed. An employment tribunal upheld Mr Morris’ direct race discrimination claim. Mr Arnett’s comment that Mr Morris was suggesting that Mr Tighe’s conduct was racially motivated amounted to direct race discrimination. Mr Morris had said nothing to indicate that he was raising race as an issue, and Mr Arnett would not have made the same suggestion if a white employee was complaining about a black manager.

The EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision. Mr Arnett chose not to categorise Mr Morris’ complaint about Mr Tighe as a simple complaint by one colleague against another, but viewed it as a complaint by a black employee against a white manager. This was genuinely demeaning. In addition, the EAT rejected the employer’s argument that the race issued would have been raised by Mr Arnett if a white employee had complained of treatment by a black manager. Mr Arnett acted in the way he did because of a stereotypical assumption that the only reason, or possible reason, that a black employee is complaining about his treatment by a white colleague is because he is alleging race discrimination.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Why so many smart leaders are terrible at leading people

29 July 2025

Talent Management

29 July 2025

Deepfake interviews. Synthetic faces. Tampered documents. As generative AI reshapes identity fraud, traditional screening methods are being put to the test. Giant Screening CEO Mathew...

Worklife Balance

28 July 2025

The issue isn’t just about time management; it’s about mental bandwidth. The cognitive load of managing multiple priorities can leave little room for self-care, creativity,...

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Queen Mary University of London – IT Services DirectorateSalary: £54,617 to £60,901 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

University of Sussex – Human Resources Salary: £25,733 to £29,179. Grade 4, per annum, pro rata if part time This provides summary information and comment

UCL – Chemistry Department / Faculty of Mathematical & Physical SciencesSalary: £54,172 to £63,752 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

University of Oxford – Department of PsychiatrySalary: £31,459 to £36,616 (discretionary range to £39,749) per annum. Grade 5 This provides summary information and comment on

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE