Ageist comments established prima facie discrimination case

In James v Gina Shoes Ltd and others, the EAT held that ageist remarks made by a managing director to an employee

In James v Gina Shoes Ltd and others, the EAT held that ageist remarks made by a managing director to an employee during a performance management process and subsequently during a grievance meeting, clearly established a prima facie case of age discrimination.

In an alleged discrimination case it is for the claimant, under the burden of proof provisions, to show on the balance of probabilities, facts from which a tribunal could conclude, in the absence of an adequate explanation, that the employer has committed an act of discrimination.

In this case the managing director (MD) was unhappy with Mr James’ performance. During the performance management process the MD asked Mr James whether it was his age that caused him not to be able to work to their expectations. He also said that if Mr James was younger, it might be possible to train him. Having been upset by the remarks, Mr James resigned and during a subsequent grievance meeting, the MD used words to the effect that, “You can’t teach an old dog new tricks.”

A tribunal decided there was not sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case of age discrimination as it was highly likely that the MD’s comments were “fleeting thoughts” which did not influence Mr James’ treatment and there was nothing else to suggest discrimination. The EAT upheld Mr James’ appeal. The MD’s remarks plainly raised a prima facie case of discrimination and it was immaterial that there was “nothing else” that demonstrated age was a factor in his employment or its termination.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

The real business of giving back

31 July 2025

Workforce Planning

31 July 2025

Dmitry Zaytsev, founder of Dandelion Civilization, argues that HR should play a bigger role in shaping how education prepares young people for work. If we...

Leadership

29 July 2025

Leadership can feel lonely at times, but it shouldn’t. Have a little empathy for yourself and ask for help when you need it. Now more...

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Queen Mary University of London – IT Services DirectorateSalary: £54,617 to £60,901 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

University of Sussex – Human Resources Salary: £25,733 to £29,179. Grade 4, per annum, pro rata if part time This provides summary information and comment

UCL – Chemistry Department / Faculty of Mathematical & Physical SciencesSalary: £54,172 to £63,752 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

University of Oxford – Department of PsychiatrySalary: £31,459 to £36,616 (discretionary range to £39,749) per annum. Grade 5 This provides summary information and comment on

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE