Search
Close this search box.

Benefit of the doubt can go to the alleged wrongdoer

 


 


Benefit
of the doubt can go to the alleged wrongdoer



In
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan, the Court of Appeal held that
where there is conflicting evidence, it could be perfectly proper for the
employer to give the alleged wrongdoer the benefit of the doubt without
feeling compelled to have to come down in favour of on one side or the other.

A
nurse from the Philippines,
was alleged to have abused a patient. A manager interviewed Ms Roldan and a
colleague (Ms Denton) who claimed to have witnessed the events. The
disciplinary panel found Ms Roldan’s evidence unconvincing and preferred that
of Ms Denton. They dismissed Ms Roldan. The tribunal found the dismissal
unfair. As the investigating manager and the disciplinary panel believed Ms
Denton had no reason to lie, they had not in any way sought to question the
reliability of her evidence, when it was clear that on one point it was not entirely
credible.

The
EAT overturned the decision but the finding of unfair dismissal was restored
by the Court of Appeal. When assessing the reasonableness of an
investigation, tribunals should take into account the gravity of the
consequences on the employee; where these are serious, the investigator must
be “even-handed” in looking for evidence in the accused’s favour as
well as evidence against them.

The
Court of Appeal added that where there is conflicting evidence, but no way of
determining which version is more credible, it could be perfectly proper to
give the alleged wrongdoer the benefit of the doubt without feeling compelled
to have to come down in favour of on one side or the other.

 

Read more

Latest News

Read More

The 3 challenges leaders face when seeking outcomes at pace

28 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099) This provides summary information

Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE