Search
Close this search box.

Marginal Gains Theory

Techniques for improving performance in sport can be successfully applied to organisations but before we buy into another performance improving theory let’s recognise that whatever managers focus on improves.

Management gurus and a lot of managers bought into the marginal gains theory. That is that a lot of very small changes , almost insignificant in themselves, when taken together made the difference between  just missing out on a meddle and getting gold. A lot of executives wondered  if the success achieved by team GB using marginal gains could be applied successfully in business.

It meant senior managers should pay a lot more attention to detail, it would mean breaking down processes to their smallest step, every task in every job needed to be examined to see if an efficiency could be squeezed out. Pains taking, time consuming , laborious but if it resulted in the much sort after improvement in performance where even modest gains could provide a competitive edge then it would be worth it.

Imagine then the impact of the revelation that the athletes were taking performance enhancing drugs. Confirmation of the suspicions of many insiders that marginal gains were an insufficient explanation for significantly improved performance. What of the implications for business leaders who invested in the marginal gains theory. What about all that energy and time spent examining the detail, making small changes and minor improvements ?

Well it explains the failure to see results or does it? What about those organisations that can point to improved performance following an intense period of applying the marginal gains approach? Perhaps when it comes to organisations what determines outcomes is whatever senior managers focus on. If senior managers focus on certain areas of performance then there will be measurable improvement in these areas.

If senior managers focus on reducing costs then costs will be reduced, if they focus on increasing income then income will increase, if the push is to generate more partnerships then partnerships will increase. Of course this only works if the focus is narrow and the number one priority. Soon though other priorities will crowd it out.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    AI’s Impact on the Workplace: A Survey of American Managers

    27 March 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata

    University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099)

    Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE