Search
Close this search box.

The toxic culture of damage limitation

Would a responsibility to be honest when things go wrong change the way organisations respond, would it prevent mistakes being repeated, would they be more willing to admit mistakes, would mistake be picked up earlier and remedial action taken quicker?
history

You have probably seen the Jim Carry comedy in which the main character , a lawyer, under goes a transformation from a compulsive liar to some one compelled always to tell the truth. The humour  is based on the awkward situations and difficulties that arise by only being able to tell the absolute truth. We lie or at least skirt around the truth to smooth social interactions and make life easier.

Organisations do the same, after all showing the organisation in the best possible light is not lying. However habitually focusing on the positives and blanking out the negatives when coupled with a defensiveness and reluctance to admit mistakes leads to cover ups and a culture more concerned with the organisations image than the safety and well-being of customers, employees and the wider community.

When things go wrong there is a tendency for organisations to be defensive, for officials to close ranks,  admit nothing, say as little as possible and make information hard to obtain. The board is more concerned with the organisation reputation than,
getting to the truth. “ Plenty of time to conduct an internal review , the priority now is damage limitation! “ Or maybe senior management think it’s more important to be seen to support the rank and file than undermining public confidence by admitting mistakes.

The tragedies of Hillsborough, the Grenfell fire, the Manchester Arena bombing have prompted calls for A Hillsborough Law that would establish the principle that public officials have a duty of candour. The need to establish this in law is in response to the experience of ordinary members of the public in getting information from public officials (including police officers) follow tragedies.

It’s about organisational transparency, openness and frankness from managers/officials,  establishing the facts, identifying  who made what decisions when and why. A duty of candour requires openness that is more than just answering questions honestly but offering information because too often the onus is on the client/public to ask the right questions.

But it’s not just Hospital Trusts, Police Forces or Local Authorities that need to be open and honest about mistakes, what about Oil Companies, the Banks, the Pharmaceutical Industry surly all organisations should embrace the principle of candour.   Because small coverups have a habit of developing into an unhealthy culture where reputation maintenance is more important than truth.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Transitioning from coaching to mentoring to drive revenue growth

    27 March 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    University of Warwick – WMGSalary: £23,144 to £25,138 per annum

    The Open University – People ServicesSalary: £57,696 to £64,914 + up to £8,000 per annum MRP supplement*

    Cardiff UniversitySalary: Competitive

    University of Oxford – Oxford Department of International DevelopmentSalary: £28,759 to £33,966 (Grade 5)

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE