Search
Close this search box.

Fun is great, but not when somebody is hurt or humiliated

A harmless piece of fun with no malicious intent or insensitive , offensive and unprofessional. Decisive action by the chief executive to restore harmony or a heavy handed reaction intended close down debate and ignore the real problem.
It started harmlessly enough just a casual observation to a colleague about some clients names that got turned into a list, circulated and added to. The list was titled Funny Names. As the Funny Names list became more widely circulated there were growing concern from some employees that the names were predominantly of Asian and non Anglo Saxon origin.
This sparked a  fierce internal debate on racism and sexism resulting in suspensions and a third of the 57 strong workforce resigning in protest. As a result the Chief Executive sent an email to all employees stating that in future there was to be no discussions on contentious societal issues at work. Politics was to be kept out of the office. Whilst this happened in a small high tec organisation the issues will be familiar to HR managers in organisations of all sizes across sectors.
This experience has been traumatic for the organisation so it’s not surprising that the chief executive would want to put an end to the destructive disharmony. Removing the list and banning its circulation as inappropriate would seem an obvious step but telling employees not to debate these issues on line, within teams or across work stations seems heavy handed, difficult to police and feels like an attempt to avoid addressing the underlying issues.
Racism and sexism are work issues. Rather than close down the debate the organisation needs to manage it. By all means take the debate off line where people tend to be more inflammatory and make it face to face in facilitated group discussions as part of of the equality and diversity strategy. The aim should be to have an open organisational culture where people can say what they are thinking with out fear of being belittled or labelled. This of course is a two way process which requires all employees to acknowledge their colleagues feelings and be willing to listen.
Yes this may bring out into the open a lot of hurt feelings that have been suppressed. It may reveal a level of unconscious bias that was previously gone unrecognised and it will probably make senior managers feel very uncomfortable. But organisations that don’t talk about the elephant in the room are in denial.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Five steps to an inclusive organisational culture for women

    17 April 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    Moulton CollegeSalary: £30,203 to £34,022 pa

    University of Warwick – Human Resources – Shared ServicesSalary: £23,144 to £25,138 per annum, pro rata

    University of Plymouth – HR OperationsSalary: £33,966 to £37,099 per annum – Grade 6

    The Head of HR Operations role has been created to harmonise and support the delivery of exceptional HR practices throughout the organisation.From Azets UK –

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE