Search
Close this search box.

Why corporate learning is a priority

Why corporate learning is a priority

Companies believe that investing in the development of their executives is more important than hiring new talent when it comes to driving change, stimulating innovation and improving corporate financial prospects, a survey of 600 business leaders from across Europe has found. FT | IE Corporate Learning Alliance launches Corporate Learning Pulse to uncover European business attitudes toward investment in people.

But, despite this, just under half those leaders surveyed find it a challenge to see how their investment in corporate learning adds value to their businesses in ways that are measurable against the bottom line. The findings are unveiled in an independent survey, Corporate Learning Pulse, commissioned by Financial Times | IE Business School Corporate Learning Alliance (www.ftiecla.com). 

Respondents in the inaugural survey, which is to be an annual event, were drawn from France, Germany, the Netherlands, the Nordic countries, Spain and the United Kingdom. They included C-suite executives, HR and learning and development leaders, and senior managers in small, medium and large organisations who had led or participated in executive development programmes in the past five years. 

Corporate learning seen as top investment
According to the research, corporate learning is seen by respondents as the top investment their organisation can make to improve business outcomes (57 percent). A larger majority – 59 percent – say investing in employees “drives change and innovation” in their businesses, rising to 65 percent among C-suite respondents taken as a specific group.

The corporate learning needs deemed most valuable are:

  • customer engagement (highlighted by 58 percent of respondents)
  • strategy and planning (58 percent)
  • successful innovation (55 percent)
  • leadership (55 percent)
  • strategy execution (54 percent) 

Impact of corporate learning
Organisations are most likely to gauge the impact of their investment as it relates to two areas: employee satisfaction and engagement. Most of the organisations have sought to measure the impact of corporate learning on: employee satisfaction and retention (74 percent); employee engagement (73 percent); customer satisfaction (69 percent); revenue and profit (64 percent). Yet fewer than half (47 percent) are satisfied with the corporate learning their organisations are currently investing in, and just 43 percent believe that such programmes give them skills to do their jobs more effectively. VanDyck Silveira, CEO of FT | IE Corporate Learning Alliance, says: “We are surprised to see the gap this major study reveals between the perceived value of corporate learning and the difficulties of measuring the business impact that such an investment can deliver. 

“More than half of the business people we surveyed understand the value that executive development delivers for their business, but less than half of respondents are fully satisfied with their learning programmes.” When it comes to corporate learning, expectations and action are misaligned. The survey found that when it comes to corporate learning, expectations and reality are often misaligned. And yet the ability to measure the eventual results tends not to be the highest priority when companies select a corporate learning partner to deliver executive development programmes. 

Only one in four senior professionals say their organisation selects corporate learning partners based on their ability to measure impact. The main criterion is whether the organisation has worked with the learning provider in the past. Among the most senior professionals (the C-suite and presidents or managing directors), marketplace reputation and rankings drive their choice of learning partners. “These findings signal a clear call to action for learning and development professionals,” says VanDyck Silveira. “They need to close the gap between expectations and reality by improving how learning impact is measured in their organisations against business performance and the bottom line.” 

Attitudes vary by size of organisation, seniority and geography
German and Spanish professionals lead the way in seeing corporate learning as a business priority with the potential for positive outcomes. Large organisations in particular have high expectations, but many of the learning and development professionals think their senior leaders do not recognise the potential of corporate learning. 

Organisations of all sizes agree that employees are the catalysts for change and innovation (59 percent) but learning and development professionals in large organisations (those with more than 500 employees) are least likely to say their senior leaders understand the value of corporate learning for the business. Large organisations have the highest expectations for the impact of corporate learning on employee engagement and organisational change. Chief learning officers and other learning and development professionals expect employee engagement scores to improve after the completion of corporate learning programmes, while those in the C-suite expect an impact on customer engagement and satisfaction. 

German business professionals are most likely to rate corporate learning as a priority (34 percent versus 24 percent overall) and a challenge they need to address in the next three years (31 percent versus 23 percent overall). Spanish professionals feel most strongly that corporate learning can achieve results for their organisations (70 percent), while those in France and the UK lag behind the 57 percent average, with 49 percent and 50 percent respectively.

www.ftiecla.com

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Having emotional intelligence, doesn’t mean being soft

8 May 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMG Salary: Competitive

Lancaster University – HR Partnering TeamSalary: £46,974 to £54,395

London School of Economics and Political Science – Human ResourcesSalary: £29,935 to £33,104 pa inclusive with potential to progress to £35,441 pa inclusive of London

C. £73k per annum (pay review pending). In this senior role, you will lead and inspire the HR team to ensure delivery of a first-rate

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE