Can Pension Ombudsman’s new powers deliver? 

Responding to the Department for Work and Pensions consultation, which explores ways to facilitate early dispute resolution, Samantha Brown, pensions partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, argues in favour of the Ombudsman’s representative having a role in dispute mediation.
care

Government published a consultation on expanding the Pensions Ombudsman’s dispute resolution powers and widening the jurisdiction of his office. Contributor Samantha Brown, Pensions Partner – Herbert Smith Freehills.

Responding to the Department for Work and Pensions consultation, which explores ways to facilitate early dispute resolution, Samantha Brown, pensions partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, argues in favour of the Ombudsman’s representative having a role in dispute mediation, but calls for “a clear separation between the different functions performed by the Ombudsman’s service to ensure that its investigations and determinations continue to be seen to be impartial and fair by all parties.” 

In Herbert Smith Freehills’ response, the firm notes that if the Government is to expand the Pensions Ombudsman’s role to include mediation (as outlined in question 3 of the consultation) three issues should be considered.  These are; the availability of mediation as an option only if all parties involved in a dispute agree to it; recognition that any settlement is a matter for agreement between the parties and that the Ombudsman will not have the power to direct how a matter should be resolved at this stage, and the ability for either party to bring mediation to an end and request to move to a full investigation at any time.

Samantha Brown said: “Reviewing the role and powers of the Pensions Ombudsman is a welcome move, given the expanded role the service now has as adviser, arbitrator and, potentially, mediator too. Any attempt to help parties resolve disputes at the earliest stage possible deserves attention, but the lines between the Ombudsman’s different functions are currently very blurred. In the interests of justice, it is essential that there is a clearer separation.”

She added: “There are clearly merits in the Ombudsman’s service being able to offer to mediate between parties, but this should only be available where all parties agree to it.  Additionally, if either party requests a full investigation it should be conducted by someone with no previous involvement in the matter to enable the parties to engage openly in any mediation process.”


Receive more HR related news and content with our monthly Enewsletter (Ebrief)

Read more

Latest News

Read More

What parenting teaches us about professional growth

15 August 2025

Employee Benefits & Reward

14 August 2025

In the race to attract and retain top talent, HR leaders are constantly reassessing how to create a compelling employee value proposition that aligns with...

Employment Law

14 August 2025

Step-by-step guide for UK employers to prepare for an employment tribunal. Learn ET1/ET3 tips, witness prep, and settlement strategies....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £33,951 to £39,906

University of Oxford – HR Centres of Excellence based within the Centre for Human GeneticsSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata). Grade 6

University of Bradford – Directorate of People and CultureSalary: £40,497 to £45,413 per annum Role 1 – 1 FTE September to end of January 2026.

University of Greater Manchester – Human Resources TeamSalary: £41,671 to £48,149 per annum

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE