Fresh evidence shows HMRC’s IR35 tool is failing firms

IR35 Shield has proven that HMRC’s Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool contains fundamental flaws that expose users to considerable risk. The evidence compares failed legal arguments made by HMRC and newly binding law, revealed in the Court of Appeal decision of the Atholl House IR35 case on April 26th 2022, with a forensic analysis of the underlying CEST programming code.

“HMRC’s Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool contains fundamental flaws that expose users to considerable risk.” That’s according to IR35 Shield, which says it has proven that The evidence compares failed legal arguments made by HMRC and newly binding law, revealed in the Court of Appeal decision of the Atholl House IR35 case on April 26th 2022, with a forensic analysis of the underlying CEST programming code. The unequivocal findings are explained in the webinar: “CEST Exposed: New proof that HMRC’s IR35 tool won’t protect you”.

These fresh revelations were found by examining the version of CEST released in November 2019 as part of HMRC’s quick-fix upgrade to CEST ahead of the planned roll-out of the Off-payroll reforms to the private sector in April 2020, which were delayed a year. But, the CEST algorithm has not been updated since.

Commenting, Dave Chaplin, CEO and founder of IR35 Shield, who discovered the failings, said: “Until recently, I had not looked under the bonnet of CEST again since the original version was published and had accepted in good faith that the original flaws had been resolved. I was surprised to discover that this was not the case. CEST was fudged, and the current version lulls its users into a false sense of compliance.

“In the vast majority of cases, when CEST determines ‘outside IR35’, it has not carried out a proper multi-factorial assessment, as the Court of Appeal ruled should be done. Instead, it has relied upon what I refer to as a ‘unicorn assessment’ – whereby CEST prematurely identifies a contract as ‘outside IR35’ based on unrealistic and easily challengeable criteria. This offers no protection for hirers and leaves them significantly exposed.

“The question now is how quickly will HMRC update its tool to align with the binding law, by adhering to its commitment made to the Public Accounts Committee on February 21st to keep CEST updated. CEST is now provably biased and the exposed unicorns will not survive. Hirers are exposed.”

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Why so many smart leaders are terrible at leading people

29 July 2025

Talent Management

29 July 2025

Deepfake interviews. Synthetic faces. Tampered documents. As generative AI reshapes identity fraud, traditional screening methods are being put to the test. Giant Screening CEO Mathew...

Worklife Balance

28 July 2025

The issue isn’t just about time management; it’s about mental bandwidth. The cognitive load of managing multiple priorities can leave little room for self-care, creativity,...

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Queen Mary University of London – IT Services DirectorateSalary: £54,617 to £60,901 per annum

University of Sussex – Human Resources Salary: £25,733 to £29,179. Grade 4, per annum, pro rata if part time

UCL – Chemistry Department / Faculty of Mathematical & Physical SciencesSalary: £54,172 to £63,752

University of Oxford – Department of PsychiatrySalary: £31,459 to £36,616 (discretionary range to £39,749) per annum. Grade 5

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE