Search
Close this search box.

Lack of strategic focus on technology at board level, poll finds

A poll from ICSA: The Governance Institute and recruitment specialist The Core Partnership reveals that just 51 percent of boards understand the challenges and opportunities that data and technology present to their organisations.
technology

A poll from ICSA: The Governance Institute and recruitment specialist The Core Partnership reveals that just 51 percent of boards understand the challenges and opportunities that data and technology present to their organisations. Contributor Peter Swabey, Policy and Research Director – ICSA.

Some 29 percent of the company secretaries who took part in the survey think that their boards do not fully understand and a further 20 percent could only attest to ‘maybe’. A lack of knowledge is viewed as the main barrier that prevents boards from engaging properly with technology at a strategic level. Some 58 percent of respondents consider this to be the main obstacle, with 22 percent alluding to another reason, 16 percent citing language as an impediment and 4 percent blaming the onboarding process.

Some of the main issues raised were as follows:

The speed at which technological advances are at pace means key aspects of the technology journey may not be provided in a timely manner

It is hard to find time in busy agendas to focus on the technology aspects

Most boards are made up of people who are of a generation that do not really understand the possibilities and threats offered by technology

There has been a focus on GDPR and cyber security but that focuses on risks rather than opportunities. Challenges arising from data management are more readily understood (eg the impact of poor data quality), but the real opportunities available to the organisation through the effective use of data are less well considered – especially through the lens of commercial strategy.

When asked if there were particular areas in which boards needed to improve their understanding, a quarter of respondents chose AI and automation. Other areas highlighted as possible areas for improvement were using data effectively, GDPR, cyber security and IT governance. Some 23 percent of respondents stating that their boards need to hone up on all of the areas mentioned.

According to Peter Swabey, Policy and Research Director at ICSA: ‘The pace of change is such that new technology is emerging quicker now than at any time previously. This can be challenging for all boards, but particularly for those predominantly made up of people who are not digital natives. On top of this, changes in corporate governance, data privacy requirements and regulation mean that it can be difficult for non-executive directors to maintain an adequate level of knowledge across all areas. While it is incumbent upon directors to proactively seek to expand their knowledge, there are time limits on what is achievable given the part-time nature of the role.

‘It might be suitable for some organisations to have an IT specialist sit on the board, but this would not be appropriate for all. Moreover, having one director with responsibility for technology might allow others to obviate their responsibility, which is clearly not an option. As one respondent quite rightly said “Technology is both an opportunity and a threat – boards need to understand how it impacts the business both operationally and strategically”. This is a responsibility that all directors must share.’


Receive more HR related news and content with our monthly Enewsletter (Ebrief)

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Myths surrounding AI in the recruitment industry busted

24 April 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of NorthamptonSalary: £44,263 to £54,395 per annum

HR Director – Interim – 9 month FTC – London – Hybrid – £100,000 – £120,000 A dynamic, global financial services business with offices based

University of Bristol – Human ResourcesSalary: £26,444 to £29,605 per annum

Queen Mary University of London – Human ResourcesSalary: £31,421 to £38,165 per annum inclusive of London Allowance

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE