Search
Close this search box.

Gaps in fire safety procedures uncovered in UK workplaces

New research from law firm Hugh James raises question over health and safety in the workplace when it comes to fire risk. Legal experts also call for more emphasis on wider health and safety training for part-time employees as disparities revealed. Comment from Mark Harvey, a Partner at Hugh James.
corporate

New research from law firm Hugh James raises question over health and safety in the workplace when it comes to fire risk. Legal experts also call for more emphasis on wider health and safety training for part-time employees as disparities revealed. Comment from Mark Harvey, a Partner at Hugh James.

Almost one in five (16 percent) Brits work for a company where not a single fire drill has been carried out in the last twelve months, despite this being a UK Government requirement for workplace health and safety regulations, according to a new survey by law firm Hugh James.

The survey, which polled 2,000 full and part-time employees working in the UK, revealed gaps in fire safety procedures when it comes to UK workplaces. Worryingly, the research highlighted that almost half (46 percent) haven’t received workplace training on what to do in the event of a fire or any health and safety policies at all. Furthermore, the findings also revealed that many couldn’t recall when the fire doors (42 percent) or fire extinguishers (28 percent) at their workplace were last inspected.

Although 89 percent of respondents said they took workplace health and safety seriously, the research highlighted there is risk of employers taking a lacklustre approach in general when it comes to overall health and safety in the workplace.

Specifically, the data showed that more than a third (36 percent) of employees either didn’t know where the accident log book is located at their work or that there isn’t one, whilst just over one in five (21 percent) of the 970 managers polled admitted to not following the health and safety protocol after every employee injury or accident.

Talking about the findings, Mark Harvey, a Partner at Hugh James, commented: “Not only does there appear to be some confusion around existing legislation amongst managers and employees, but there is also a lack of understanding when it comes to the consequences of misconduct in the long-run.

“With over a third of all employees (36 percent) admitting to not feeling competent enough to know all health and safety policies in the event of an emergency, it’s important that everyone in the workplace understands that they have a vital part to play when it comes to being responsible for one another to avoid mishaps in the future.

“It is really positive that the Health & Safety Executive’s (HSE) most recent data shows that the rate of non-fatal injury to employees reported by employers to the HSE had fallen in 2015/16 which reflects a long-term downward trend.  However, we need to ensure that employers and their managers truly report what is happening in the workplace.  We therefore urge companies to put real emphasis on providing the right health and safety training to employees to avoid future misconduct – whether it’s putting in place the correct procedures for regular fire drill tests or simply keeping accident log books up to date.”

The wide-ranging survey also revealed disparities between full and part-time workers when it came to health and safety training in the workplace more generally, with those in part-time employment at risk of missing out on adequate training.  Nearly half (47 percent) of part-time employees said that they hadn’t had a health and safety induction when they joined their current company, compared with just under a third of full-time employees (29 percent) saying that they had not received an induction when they started their job. Part-time workers also felt less competent than their full-time counterparts in the event of an emergency, with 43 percent admitting they didn’t feel they would know enough should an incident occur.

Interestingly the research also showed that part-time workers may be often put under additional pressure in the workplace when it came to taking a break during office hours.  The study highlighted that nearly two thirds (61 percent) of part-time workers said that their employer didn’t actively encourage them to take a break during the working day compared with 47 percent of full-time workers who answered the same question.

Mark added: “With many employees working part-time patterns or more flexible hours than ever before, there’s a chance that some people might miss out on vital health and safety inductions and more general training – especially when time in a busy day is already tight.  We would therefore encourage employers to be far more rigorous and factor in providing adequate training for those part-time workers who may not be in the workplace when, for example, a fire drill takes place – at least so they get a clear walkthrough of what to do should an emergency occur.”

The survey, commissioned by Hugh James, was conducted by Atomik Research in June 2017.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

How to avoid employee disengagement in the age of AI

25 April 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick 8211 Human ResourcesSalary £33 966 to £44 263 per annum

University of CambridgeSalary £37 099

University of Cambridge 8211 Institute of Continuing Education Salary £32 332 to £38 205 pa

Managing the compliance team and overseeing the function making sure all the necessary job sites are live any renewals such as DBS etc are kept

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE