Disillusionment over employee benefits communication

Industry professionals are disillusioned with employee benefits communication; at best they rate it as mediocre and at worst terrible, says David Pugh, managing partner at Lemonade Reward.
ethics

Industry professionals are disillusioned with employee benefits communication; at best they rate it as mediocre and at worst terrible, says David Pugh, managing partner at Lemonade Reward.

His comments follow recent interviews with HR, benefit and reward specialists* who were asked to score their in-house programmes from five (excellent) to one (terrible); 87 percent rated them between three and one and the same number indicated their employees would do the same. Feedback to the employee benefits firm shows the key challenge is getting the right messages to the right people, followed by thinking of new ways to communicate benefits, lack of resource and budget constraints. Long sign-off processes, out of date software and finding new/innovative benefits are also issues.

“A further hurdle” suggests David “is a failure to measure the effectiveness of their employee benefits communications. If they did so, they could act upon the results.” Forty three per cent concede they can’t remember or they’ve never measured their activity and 27 percent advise it’s been within the last year. When asked about the most favoured channels of communication, respondents cited email and intranet, followed by face-to-face and letters. Social media, micro-sites and videos ranked ahead of the phone and other vehicles such as posters and washroom advertisements. When asked to describe their employee communication style, 40 percent gave the top answer traditional- only 7 percent consider their style creative and 3 percent interactive.

David continues: Despite advances in technology and flexible working, employers do not appear to be moving with the times. We have whole generations who now access and share information via tablets and mobiles, yet employers fail to e-enable their benefits packages and develop apps which work on these bring your own devices.”

He concludes: “While it’s encouraging to find respondents are keen to review their programmes – 87 percent do this at least yearly – if they aren’t communicating their rewards in a way that resonates with employees, their efforts will be wasted. Our interviews show there’s a clear desire to move employee benefits communication up a gear and make it more innovative and engaging – the tools are there to do so, so what’s everybody waiting for?”

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Why so many smart leaders are terrible at leading people

29 July 2025

Talent Management

29 July 2025

Deepfake interviews. Synthetic faces. Tampered documents. As generative AI reshapes identity fraud, traditional screening methods are being put to the test. Giant Screening CEO Mathew...

Worklife Balance

28 July 2025

The issue isn’t just about time management; it’s about mental bandwidth. The cognitive load of managing multiple priorities can leave little room for self-care, creativity,...

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Queen Mary University of London – IT Services DirectorateSalary: £54,617 to £60,901 per annum

University of Sussex – Human Resources Salary: £25,733 to £29,179. Grade 4, per annum, pro rata if part time

UCL – Chemistry Department / Faculty of Mathematical & Physical SciencesSalary: £54,172 to £63,752

University of Oxford – Department of PsychiatrySalary: £31,459 to £36,616 (discretionary range to £39,749) per annum. Grade 5

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE