AI in university is a positive, providing policy protects academic integrity

Despite not using it as much as expected, more than half (52%) of university students say that their grades have improved since using AI. This comes as the majority of both university educators (85%) and students (67%) think AI is having a positive impact on higher education.

UK university students are using AI significantly less in their studies than their educators think they are, according to new research from the leading online learning provider, Coursera. 

The survey of 1,000 students and 500 educators at UK universities found that educators think that students are using AI to complete around two-fifths (43%) of their studies on average. Whereas students say they are only using AI to complete almost a quarter (24%) of their tasks on average. In fact, just over 1 in 5 (21%) university students surveyed say that they don’t use AI at all in their studies.

When it comes to specific uses for AI, students appear to be using it to enhance their learning and prepare for exams. They are using AI most for research (56%), exam revision (43%) and writing content like essays and assignments (39%).

Although they may not be using it as much as their educators think, more than half (52%) of university students surveyed say that their grades have improved since using AI, with 8% saying that they have improved substantially.

AI is having positive impacts on higher education, and educators are more likely to feel this

The majority of university educators (85%) and students (67%) think that AI is having a positive impact on higher education. Personalised learning (51%), increased productivity and efficiency (47%) and better support (45%) are the top benefits of AI usage according to students and educators surveyed.

Educators appear to be more positive overall about AI’s impact on higher education. Just over a fifth (21%) don’t think AI is having, or could have, a negative impact on higher education – seven times the proportion of students who said the same (3%). Continuing this trend, less than half (44%) of students think AI has improved the quality of higher education, while 72% of educators believe the same.

Lack of AI policy threatens academic integrity

Despite the overall positive sentiment around the impact of AI on higher education, less than half (48%) of educators say their university has a policy in place to manage it, while almost two-thirds (62%) say higher education is unprepared to handle AI usage. Without AI regulation in place, 68% of students and 74% of educators believe that the technology will undermine the credibility of university degrees. 

More than half (54%) of students surveyed say that the rise in AI usage makes passing exams easier than it used to be, while a greater proportion (70%) of educators feel the same way. With this in mind, over half (53%) of educators and 43% of students think that using AI to help with university work should be considered cheating.

As many as 1 in 10 students surveyed admit to submitting AI-generated work without disclosing it. And while over a third (38%) of educators say they’ve received more AI-generated assignments and essays in the past six months, only 42% feel confident in detecting it.

Skills needed to maximise benefits of AI 

It’s not just students who are using AI for their work, almost half (48%) of university educators surveyed often use the technology, with just over 1 in 5 (21%) using AI all the time. Educators use it most for tasks like drafting correspondence to students (46%), setting work for students (45%) and planning lectures or tutorials (45%). Despite this, less than 2 in 5 (37%) educators think their peers have the right skills to use AI to their advantage.

A third (33%) of students believe using AI in their studies is helping or would help to prepare them to use it in their future work. However, almost a quarter (23%) would use AI in their studies more if they had a better understanding of the technology. 

With only 42% of educators saying their universities have incorporated AI literacy into their curriculum, there is some way to go to ensure students are well-equipped to use the technology effectively. 

Marni Baker Stein, Chief Content Officer at Coursera, commented: “This research shows AI is already delivering tangible benefits in higher education, from improved student grades to enhanced educator productivity. However, there is a notable gap between educators’ perceptions and actual student AI usage. This overestimation could lead to restrictive policies being put in place. Instead, universities should focus on developing comprehensive AI literacy programmes. Clear guidelines and proper training will not only protect academic integrity but also ensure graduates enter the workforce with the skills to leverage AI effectively in their careers.”

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    The evolving leadership persona

    6 December 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    University of Glasgow – Estates DirectorateSalary: £40,247 to £45,163 per annum. UofG Grade 7

    HR M&A Expertise: Extensive experience having led 10+ mergers and acquisitions within or for a global organization, focusing on HR due diligence and integration planning.

    Job Details: HR Director – Mergers & Acquisitions. Join Sage as our Director of HR – Mergers & Acquisitions, a high-visibility role where you’ll lead

    Join Sage as our Director of HR – Mergers & Acquisitions, a high-visibility role where you’ll lead M&A efforts for the People Function—from due diligence

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE