Search
Close this search box.

Cleaner wins unfair dismissal claim after making protected disclosures about working conditions

In Mr P Hernandez v Swiftclean Ltd Mr Hernandez was employed by Swiftclean Ltd as a cleaning operative from 4 September 2018 until his dismissal (with effect from 21 September 2020). At the time of his dismissal, he earned £9 per hour and worked 48 hours per week. He was dismissed on grounds of poor performance but claimed not to have been warned about poor performance prior to his dismissal and maintains that no process was followed in dismissing him.

In Mr P Hernandez v Swiftclean Ltd Mr Hernandez was employed by Swiftclean Ltd as a cleaning operative from 4 September 2018 until his dismissal (with effect from 21 September 2020). At the time of his dismissal, he earned £9 per hour and worked 48 hours per week. He was dismissed on grounds of poor performance but claimed not to have been warned about poor performance prior to his dismissal and maintains that no process was followed in dismissing him.

On 23 January 2020, he and two colleagues raised a protected disclosure via their trade union representative, in which they raised concerns about, amongst other things, being pressured to work extra time, being provided with inadequate equipment, being required to drive a car with expired insurance, and not being given gloves to use when cleaning toilets. They raised a further protected disclosure about the lack of appropriate information or training in respect of the COVID-19 pandemic and a failure to provide adequate personal protective equipment.

The tribunal found that Hernandez was not shown any of the client complaints that allegedly led to his dismissal, nor was any process followed in dismissing him.

Employment Judge Smeaton said the real reason for Hernandez’s dismissal was because his employer was “annoyed he had raised protected disclosures and used his trade union in order to do so and was punishing him as a result”.

The tribunal ruled that Hernandez’s claims of unfair and automatic unfair dismissal were well-founded, as was his claim of unlawful detriment.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Creating a suicide safer workplace

6 May 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

HEAD OF HR (MATERNITY COVER). Hours: 28 hours per week (flexible working opportunities available). Salary: £50,500 – £54,351 per annum (FTE). £50,500 – £54,351 a

If you would like to find out more information about this role, please see the attached job specification.From NHS Jobs – Tue, 09 Apr 2024

This is a new role within the People and Workforce team in the Integrated Care Board for Herefordshire and Worcestershire. £70,000 – £85,000 a yearFrom

Full Time £ Competitive / Per Annum REF: NU2824. Closing deadline for applications: 13/05/2024. The Director of Student Recruitment is a new role, and one

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE