Search
Close this search box.

Why the consultation period matters when making redundancies

Running a business can be challenging, and never more so than when decisions need to be made that potentially affect the lives and livelihoods of employees.

Sadly, however, it is part and parcel of the day job, and most business owners and decision makers will grapple with the prospects of having to let people go, and the subsequent redundancy process, at some point during their career.

While the decision itself might be tough, it’s absolutely vital that the process is handled correctly, or employers could find themselves facing legal action.

In the UK, employment law protects employees from unfair redundancy selection. As the recent case of P&O Ferries has highlighted, a failure to follow the correct procedures when it comes to consultation periods, could land a company in really hot water facing damage to their reputation, or worse, in front of politicians, an employment tribunal judge, and even facing a criminal prosecution.

The P&O case was slightly different in that it was subject to Maritime Law rather than English Employment Law and so it is difficult for us to say exactly what they did and didn’t do wrong. What we can do however, is to make sure that employers who are looking at making redundancies know how to do this correctly.

Firstly, when considering redundancies, it’s important to stress that it is the job or role itself that is redundant, and not the person. That is an important differentiator.

There must be a genuine reason behind why an employee is being made redundant too, not simply because a business wants to get rid of a troublesome employee. A proper and meaningful redundancy process also needs to be planned, with sufficient time given to communicate the proposals to staff before commencing consultation.

Depending on the number of employees affected, consultation may have to last a minimum or 30 days and take place between the employer and an existing trade union or elected employee representatives. If there is no trade union or existing employee representatives, then an election process will need to be undertaken; and this can add a significant amount of time to the process before any consultation has actually taken place.

With 19 or fewer redundancies, there is no minimum requirement for the length of the consultation period. However, where 20 or more redundancies are proposed within a 90-day period, then the consultation period must be at least 30 days before any dismissals can take effect. This increases to 45 days where 100 or more redundancies are proposed.

Why does it matter?

Following the correct redundancy process is important for a number of reasons. Firstly, because it is the law, and businesses and business owners could face considerable claims for compensation where they get it wrong; and in the case of a failure to consult for the minimum period of time where 20 or more redundancies are proposed, could also face criminal penalties, including fines, as well as compensation claims for up to 13 week’s actual pay per employee.

Secondly, a fair consultation process allows employers and employees to discuss other options that could avoid redundancy entirely, whilst also giving workers time to prepare and begin searching for alternative employment.

By communicating meaningfully with staff, it also allows them to understand:

  • The reasons for the proposed redundancies;
  • If redundancies can be avoided;
  • How the impact of redundancy can be mitigated, for example, through alternative roles or retraining.

In the case of P&O Ferries, workers were left without any form of employment and were not given a fair consultation process to provide feedback and explore whether redundancy was necessary.

The full extent of the punishments that the business will face has yet to come to light, but it’s likely to be far reaching and costly.

It’s important to remember that when making an employee redundant is not a fast and easy way to solve problems within your business. Without a genuine reason for redundancy, businesses could face legal proceedings for unfair dismissal, which not only costs money, but your reputation, too.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    How to work differently to protect the planet

    30 April 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    King 039 s College London 8211 Human ResourcesSalary £27 979 to £35 487 per annum pro rata

    University of East London 8211 People amp Culture HR Salary From £70 913 Starting from per annum inclusive of London Weighting

    University of Sussex 8211 HR Payroll Salary £37 099 to £44 263 per annum pro rata if part time

    Azets client experience is based on delivering a highly personalised service through its local office network and proprietary digital workplace technology From Azets UK 8211

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE