In the case held in the Court of Appeal in Page v Lord Chancellor, a lay magistrate in Kent, Mr Page, who is also a Christian and has a strong belief that it is in the best interests of every child to be brought up by a mother and a father had opposed an adoption application by a same sex couple in 2014 because of his private views and had been reprimanded following a complaint by his fellow magistrates.
He then participated in media interviews around the matter which led to his removal from the bench in March 2016. The Court of Appeal followed the tribunal and the EAT in finding that this decision was not discriminatory. Mr Page was not removed from the magistracy because of his religious beliefs or because he had complained of discrimination.
The decision had instead been taken because he made it clear that he was not prepared to carry out his judicial responsibilities in a non-biased manner and in accordance with the law and had done so publicly.
Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
