In Brown & Anor v Neon Management Ltd & Anor, Brown and Bhoma resigned on 16 March 2018 as a result of an alleged repudiatory breach of contract, including failing to pay salary increases/discretionary bonuses and trying to introduce new detrimental contractual terms. Brown gave 12 months’ notice and Bhoma gave 6 months’ notice, with both indicating they would be working out the entirety of their notice periods. On 16 May 2018, both employees resigned with immediate effect in response to another alleged repudiatory breach, i.e. further failure to pay salary increases/bonuses, and making an unjustified finding of misconduct and reporting that conduct to the regulator, Lloyd’s of London. In ruling on the breach of contract claim, the High Court made the important point that resignation on notice because of a repudiatory breach of contract where the notice period amounts to six months or more constitutes an acceptance of the employment contract, so keeping it alive. However, any further breaches during the notice period may be taken into account. Here, the ‘sting in the tail’ was that the 16 May breaches amounted to a repudiation of the contract and Brown and Bhoma were entitled to damages.
This update provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented, and judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for more information. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.