Search
Close this search box.

Picketing code to be updated to tackle intimidation

The Government response to the consultation, ‘Tackling intimidation of non-striking workers’, indicates that evidence was provided of people being intimidated by individuals on picket lines and the use of social media to intimidate workers who have chosen not to strike, including the online posting of photos of non-striking workers accompanied by derogatory comments.

The Government response to the consultation, ‘Tackling intimidation of non-striking workers’, indicates that evidence was provided of people being intimidated by individuals on picket lines and the use of social media to intimidate workers who have chosen not to strike, including the online posting of photos of non-striking workers accompanied by derogatory comments. Having analysed almost 200 responses, the package of action to be taken forward includes strengthening the Code of Practice on Picketing to set out the rights and responsibilities of parties involved in, or affected by industrial disputes, including on the use of social media and protests linked to industrial disputes. In addition, the Government will work with the police, ACAS and other stakeholders to ensure that guidance fully reflects the practical steps necessary to ensure that picketing remains peaceful.

Many of the proposals originally put forward will not be progressed, including for unions to publish their plans on intended action during industrial disputes covering picketing, protests or a social media campaign. On the social media issue, the statutory Code of Practice, which is admissible in evidence before any court, tribunal or the Central Arbitration Committee where considered relevant, will now cover its use.

Content Note

The aim is to provide summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. In particular, where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out full details of all the facts, the legal arguments presented by the parties and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links provided to access full details. If no link is provided contact us for further information. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Steering Leadership in the Digital Era: Adapting to Change and Embracing Ethical Leadership – ARTICLE OF THE WEEK – Issue 234 – April 2024

1 May 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Department of BiochemistrySalary: £25,742 to £29,605 pa This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

University of Cambridge – Human Resources Division, Central CambridgeSalary: £40,521 to £54,395 pa This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Cambridge – Department of MedicineSalary: £25,742 to £29,605 pa This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Oldham CollegeSalary: £30,693 to £35,707 pa This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE