Inappropriate guidance is a massive barrier to impact on financial wellbeing

An alarming report by the BBC highlights the risks of unqualified support in employee assistance programs (EAPs).

The BBC reported that an employee contacted their EAP that offered professional support and shared that he’d been having suicidal thoughts. This is a situation that should only be tackled by a trained professional. What was he told? That he should go on a date with his wife.

The same provider was also alleged to have told its counselors to keep call times down, limit referrals to therapists and to keep conversations solutions-focused. At the time the story broke, the provider was due to be investigated by the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP).

Inappropriate guidance: a massive barrier to impact

 This is a clear example of inappropriate guidance, which is especially terrible when it comes to financial wellbeing. Inappropriate guidance can be a dangerous thing and there is lots of it floating around on TikTok, Twitter/X and other social platforms from well-intentioned-but-misguided family and friends and from randomers down the pub. That’s not to mention the more nefarious guidance from darker, more exploitative parts of society that try to take advantage of people’s financial needs.

This is far more dangerous than is known or talked about across society. Imagine an employee who is going through a divorce, unable to talk to their employer and also drowning in debt. They see a cryptocurrency advert on social media and invest what little they have left in a desperate bid to solve their financial woes.

Ultimately, these situations should make organisations sit up and wonder where their employees are getting their financial guidance and support from. There’s a real imperative to provide them with the right guidance: professional guidance. But as we have just seen, not all professional guidance is created equal and what makes this amateurs-dressed-as-professionals guidance so dangerous is that people are primed in society to trust professionals.

So, while they may not follow the TikTok guidance, there’s a good chance they’ll trust the ‘professional’ assigned to help them. And that’s a big problem if that person is not suitably qualified.

Stigma: the second barrier to impact

 Stigma makes this whole situation more difficult. A lot of people aren’t willing to share that they’re struggling with money. That makes inappropriate guidance far more dangerous as you don’t know that people are accessing it and following it. This is especially true in today’s hybrid working world where employees could be following inappropriate guidance and getting into trouble with money and, as an employer, you would be completely blind to it.

Money stigma is a terrible thing for society and it’s very important that we tackle it – we’ve made progress on mental health stigma and it’s really opened up the conversation and left fewer people suffering in silence. One of the best ways to normalise the conversation about money is to give people professional support because these professionals have thousands of hours of experience dealing with very similar concerns.Simply knowing that many other people are going through similar situations is an effective way to tackle money stigma.

Don’t settle for anything less than true, professional support

 Professional support is the gold standard. Thousands of hours of training and experience, an ethical model and a focus on delivering the very best care for employees: these are inherent to professional solutions and you should never go with a provider that cannot demonstrate these.

The amateurs-as-professionals issue is just one of the reasons the wellbeing industry is getting a bad rap for ineffective solutions. We’ve also seen unproven technology used for interventions and a focus on the short-term where providers chase increasing employee knowledge as the end goal rather than behavioural change.

But wellbeing works when backed by true professionals and the right business model that prioritises value for the end user and organisation. This means empowerment across all levels of the business and long-term behavioural change are the endgame.

 

 

 

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Balancing Global Standards with Local Nuance in Workforce Policies

14 August 2025

Talent Management

13 August 2025

The future for talent acquisition looks uncertain and nuanced, but for those able to capitalise on the opportunities, there's significant potential....

Corporate Social Responsibility

12 August 2025

As we move forward, it's clear that community engagement and volunteering will continue to play a vital role in shaping responsible business practices. By embracing...

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £33,951 to £39,906

University of Oxford – HR Centres of Excellence based within the Centre for Human GeneticsSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata). Grade 6

University of Bradford – Directorate of People and CultureSalary: £40,497 to £45,413 per annum Role 1 – 1 FTE September to end of January 2026.

University of Greater Manchester – Human Resources TeamSalary: £41,671 to £48,149 per annum

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE