Search
Close this search box.

Risk assessment is not required for every pregnancy




























Risk
assessment is not required for every pregnancy




In O’Neill v Buckinghamshire CC, the EAT held there is
no general obligation to carry out a risk assessment on pregnant employees.
In order to trigger the obligation the work must be of a kind which could
involve a risk of harm or danger to the health and safety of an expectant
mother or her baby.

When Ms O’Neill became pregnant, the Head Teacher started a risk
assessment. Because of school holidays, sick leave and maternity leave, the
risk assessment was not discussed with Ms O’Neill. She claimed this was a
failure to conduct the risk assessment fully and amounted to sex
discrimination under S.3A of the Sex Discrimination Act, which makes less
favourable treatment on the grounds of pregnancy unlawful. The tribunal
disagreed. The evidence demonstrated that Ms O’Neill’s work involved no risks
to her or her baby, so the duty to conduct a risk assessment did not apply. Ms
O’Neill appealed, arguing that there is a general obligation to carry out a
risk assessment on pregnant employees.

The EAT rejected Ms O’Neill’s

appeal. The Court of Appeal in Madarassy v Nomura
International Plc [2007] IRLR 246 made it clear that
there was no general obligation to carry out a risk assessment on pregnant
employees with the result that failure to carry out such a risk assessment
would be automatic sex discrimination. The duty only arises where risks to the
health and safety of any new or expectant mother, or to that of their babies
could arise from work processes or conditions. In this case Ms O’Neill was
simply not

exposed to any such risks.

 

 

 

 

Read more

Latest News

Read More

The freelancer revolution: a new standard for equity and ownership in the gig economy

7 May 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMG Salary: Competitive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases

Lancaster University – HR Partnering TeamSalary: £46,974 to £54,395 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate

London School of Economics and Political Science – Human ResourcesSalary: £29,935 to £33,104 pa inclusive with potential to progress to £35,441 pa inclusive of London

C. £73k per annum (pay review pending). In this senior role, you will lead and inspire the HR team to ensure delivery of a first-rate

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE