Search
Close this search box.

We need to make it ‘manly’ to ask for help

Men are three times more likely to die by suicide than women. And all the evidence, from research and anecdotally, suggests that’s because men don’t and won’t ask for help.

Men are three times more likely to die by suicide than women. And all the evidence, from research and anecdotally, suggests that’s because men don’t and won’t ask for help.

Suicidal thoughts themselves are relatively common in any population: it is estimated that 1 in 5 people have a suicidal thought in their lifetime. But that does not mean that these will be acted upon. For every successful suicide there are 20 attempts. Men appear to be more likely to act on suicidal thoughts and tend to choose a more lethal method compared to women.

The critical importance of people talking about mental health was demonstrated by what happened to suicide levels during the pandemic and lockdowns. In spite of fears over isolation and the impact of health worries, data from the Office for National Statistics shows a decline in the number of suicides. Covid-19 was the source of a shared reason for worry, negative emotions became ‘normal’ for many more people, there was more active reaching out to people who were isolated. More people, both men and women, felt able to speak up and ask for help.

Gender differences in terms of thinking about and expressing feelings are deep-rooted in our culture. Studies show that parents talk differently to boys and girls: so mothers might use more emotional words with daughters, discuss sad events and issues. Overall, a smaller emotional vocabulary is programmed into boys – and as men grow older they also may often lose their emotional closeness with friends, there are even stronger expectations around demonstrating a standard kind of unemotional male persona.

To start having an impact on male suicide levels, we need a new language and way of talking about what constitutes being ‘manful’ in the 21st century. Mental health and suicide messages based around statistics alone fail to have much impact because they don’t help men understand what to do next. Identifying that three quarters of men are unable to talk about how they feel is not a call to action, or even especially instructive. At best, such messages fall into the ‘so what’ category, or, at worst, ‘man-shaming’. 

Men first of all need to recognise and accept the need for support. After a life of socially-constrained emotions and denial, it may well be difficult for them to find the most helpful labels internally in order to accept what they are feeling, labels that aren’t linked to  shame and stigma. These are feelings made worse among men because they are unable to imagine a psychologically safe place in which they could choose to open up.

We need to change the narrative and reinforce what a ‘good’ man is: how he has a healthy kind of relationship to his emotions and feelings rather than an iron mastery, using words like ‘flexible’, ‘open minded’, ‘comfortable in his own skin’, ‘tender’, ‘emotional’, ‘caring’, ‘honest’, ‘loyal’, ‘compassionate’, ‘self-aware’, ‘family orientated’, ‘kind’, ‘confident’, ‘responsible’, ‘respectful’, ‘appreciative’. In other words, a strong picture of ways of acting and behaving that are far less gender loaded and provide more instruction of how to be and how to act. The gains being how they can become a better and stronger person in their flexibility and openness, a better human rather than just a better ‘man’. So not fighting against the old, rigid bonds of ‘masculinity’.

Even the terms we use such as ‘mental health’ have become loaded, associated with ill-health, weakness and shame — a labelling that in turn becomes rejected. Just instructing men to ‘talk’ about their mental health leads to an immediate fight with male stereotypes. Through a process of normalisation, an ongoing stream of examples from leaders, role models, story-tellers and peers we will have more opportunities to show by example what desirable behaviours and outcomes for men really look like. In practice that also means making sure there are safe spaces where men can feel confident about making their own steps down that different path.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    The 3 challenges leaders face when seeking outcomes at pace

    28 March 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata

    University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099)

    Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE