
BA’s ‘no visible jewellery’ policy not discriminatory
BA’s ‘no visible jewellery’ policy not discriminatory In Eweida v British Airways Plc, the Court of Appeal held that BA’s ... View Article
Published: 22 February 2010
|BA’s ‘no visible jewellery’ policy not discriminatory In Eweida v British Airways Plc, the Court of Appeal held that BA’s ... View Article
Published: 22 February 2010
|Even-handed dress code was not discriminatory In Dansie v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis the EAT held that a ... View Article
Published: 22 February 2010
|Rejection of disability-related explanation was not discriminatory In Edinburgh Council v Dickson, the EAT held that although a diabetic employee’s ... View Article
Published: 22 February 2010
|Acas encourages employers to prepare for employee engagement Acas is encouraging UK businesses to prepare for the potential economic up-turn ... View Article
Published: 22 February 2010
|IBM tops Stonewall’s list of 2010 gay-friendly employers Stonewall’s Top 100 Employers 2010, showcasing Britain’s best employers for lesbian, gay ... View Article
Published: 22 February 2010
|Additional paternity leave and pay regulations published The Government has published six sets of draft regulations to enable the introduction ... View Article
Published: 22 February 2010
|Risk assessment is not required for every pregnancy In O’Neill v Buckinghamshire CC, the EAT held there is no general ... View Article
Published: 25 January 2010
|No convincing reason for using “younger” in the person specification In Beck v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce a 42-year-old ... View Article
Published: 25 January 2010
|‘Elder’ fire-fighters and dentists lose age discrimination claims The ECJ held in two separate discrimination claims that restricting applicants to ... View Article
Published: 25 January 2010
|Right to fair trial not breached when adjournment during Ramadan refused In Khan v Vignette Europe Ltd the EAT held ... View Article
Published: 25 January 2010
|