Trainee who tipped off SRA awarded £36,000 by employment tribunal over unfair dismissal

A solicitor, Ms. R Kaur, has been awarded over £36,000 by a tribunal after being unfairly dismissed for raising concerns about her law firm’s management to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

In Ms. R Kaur v Gillen De Alwis Solicitors Ltd a solicitor dismissed after raising concerns about her firm to the Solicitors Regulation Authority has been awarded more than £36,000 by an employment tribunal.

Kaur, who represented herself, was employed under a two-year training contract. The property division where she worked was short-staffed and the employed solicitor who ran the department died shortly before Kaur joined.

In judgment, employment judge Leonard-Johnston said: ‘From the evidence before me it is clear that from the outset the firms’ leadership had not put effective systems in place to manage the workload of the property department, to manage human resources or to supervise the members of staff who were not legally qualified.’

He added: ‘I find that the respondent failed to fulfil the fundamental purpose of the training contract in that it did not provide training to the claimant. The claimant was given insufficient supervision and training, was treated as if she were a qualified lawyer and criticised for not being so, and the claimant was blamed for problems which ultimately arose out of the failure of the firm’s management to properly supervise and manage the practice.

‘The respondent also breached the implied term of trust and confidence by subjecting the claimant to behaviour that constituted bullying and harassment.’

‘The claimant was seriously concerned about the disorganisation and lack of management, because of the negative impact that this was having on the clients of the firm who were receiving a poor service. The claimant viewed the issue as a matter of protecting consumer rights.’

The judge found the firm was not entitled to dismiss Kaur without notice as she was not guilty of gross misconduct.

Finding Kaur had been unfairly dismissed, the judge added: ‘Particularly in relation to the timing of her dismissal, I find that the claimant has established it is more likely than not that the reason for her dismissal was the complaints she was making about the firm’s management.’

Kaur was awarded £36,062 for her unfair dismissal claim and was awarded a further £362, the statutory one-week notice period, in relation to the breach of contract.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Returning new parents are expected to work and deliver the same way they did before

    15 February 2025

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    SME #HR #HRJobs #FamilyBusiness. DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES – For a Family Run SME. Are you a strategic HR leader ready to shape the future

    To be considered for the role, you must be a highly experienced HR Director with recent education experience. Panoramic Associates is pleased to be partnering

    University of Cambridge – Department of Computer Science and TechnologySalary: £30,505 to £34,866 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas

    As a result of ongoing international growth, the business is seeking to appoint a UK HR Director, based in UK. Serve as a strategic and

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE