Search
Close this search box.

Network Rail workers discriminated against female colleague by watching porn and being extremely sexist

In Ms R Owens v Network Rail Rowena Owens was subjected to ‘extreme sexism’ by at least 16 male workers at the large signal centre in Wimbledon, South-West London. Signaller Ms Owens was quizzed about oral sex, had to put up with looking at images of topless women around the office, and said female train drivers were routinely unfairly criticised. The employment tribunal held in Croydon, London, found there were at least 25 separate incidents of sex discrimination.

In Ms R Owens v Network Rail Rowena Owens was subjected to ‘extreme sexism’ by at least 16 male workers at the large signal centre in Wimbledon, South-West London. Signaller Ms Owens was quizzed about oral sex, had to put up with looking at images of topless women around the office, and said female train drivers were routinely unfairly criticised. The employment tribunal held in Croydon, London, found there were at least 25 separate incidents of sex discrimination.

On her first day at work, when Ms Owens offered to make tea for her colleagues, a male signaller referred to by the tribunal as ‘RS’ said ‘how do you like your oral sex, giving or receiving?’. In December 2016, another colleague ‘MB’ watched a porn video while on duty and exclaimed ‘there’s nothing like a bit of dwarf porn’ while his son was sat next to him.

After Christmas 2016, Ms Owens started noticing two of her colleagues, ‘AF’ and ‘MB’, walk behind her while she was working and deliberately burp loudly as they walked past. Around this time ‘WC’ sat next to Ms Owens and deliberately burped loudly and continuously for in excess of 15 minutes until she eventually had to ask him if he was OK.

She also said female drivers were criticised differently to how male drivers were when they made a mistake. On at least three occasions, she said she heard ‘PT’ say things like ‘do you think women should be in the workplace?’ and ‘I think women should be in the home’ while she was the only woman working.

Ms Owens claimed she was excluded from takeaway orders when male colleagues ordered food and was not made a vegetarian option at a team meal even though she was asked specifically about it. She submitted a grievance in November 2017, highlighting these concerns and others, but it was dismissed.

But, Ms Owens has lost her case and won’t receive any compensation – because she took the case to tribunal too late.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Rise in recruitment fraud must urgently be checked

28 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMGSalary: £23,144 to £25,138 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and

The Open University – People ServicesSalary: £57,696 to £64,914 + up to £8,000 per annum MRP supplement* This provides summary information and comment on the

Cardiff UniversitySalary: Competitive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information

University of Oxford – Oxford Department of International DevelopmentSalary: £28,759 to £33,966 (Grade 5) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE