Search
Close this search box.

HR worker wins discrimination claim after being refused pay rise because of impending maternity leave

In Miss L Musguin v Breyer Group plc Ms Musguin, an HR assistant, joined Breyer, a construction company, in July 2017 and went on maternity leave with her first child from June 2019 to August 2020. While she was off, a junior HR coordinator was hired to provide cover and was offered a £27,000 salary. When Ms Musguin came back from maternity leave in August 2020, she learned of the assistant’s salary.

In Miss L Musguin v Breyer Group plc Ms Musguin, an HR assistant, joined Breyer, a construction company, in July 2017 and went on maternity leave with her first child from June 2019 to August 2020. While she was off, a junior HR coordinator was hired to provide cover and was offered a £27,000 salary. When Ms Musguin came back from maternity leave in August 2020, she learned of the assistant’s salary.

‘Ms Musguin was very unhappy that there was only a £3,000 difference between her salary as an HR Assistant compared to the more junior HR Coordinator role’, a tribunal report said.

‘She believed it to be deeply unfair and to undervalue her work and her experience.’

Just days later, Ms Musguin – now pregnant with her second child – made an argument to HR manager Hardeep Rayat that she should get a pay rise.

However, he later informed her that directors Tim Breyer and Neil Fisher rejected his request for her pay rise.

The report said: ‘Ms Musguin’s evidence is that Mr Rayat went into the meeting and that when he met her afterwards he told her that he had made the request for a pay rise but that this had been refused by Mr Fisher because she was due to commence a period of maternity leave at Christmas.

‘Mr Rayat told her that Mr Fisher had said that as she would only be in the business for four months, a pay rise was not feasible.’

Ms Musguin felt ‘disillusioned’, the tribunal heard. Following the meeting, a revised ‘business proposal’ was produced which stated the £2,000 pay rise would be granted if Ms Musguin ‘assumed additional responsibilities’.

She went on sick leave until her maternity leave, suffering sleep issues, the tribunal heard, and has since left the company.

‘Her evidence was that, as she told Mr Rayat, the damage was done: she was not worthy of a pay rise simply because she was growing a human.

‘The refusal of a pay rise is unfavourable treatment. Even if she was not entitled to a pay rise, the refusal to exercise discretion in favour of giving a pay rise because of impending maternity leave is clearly unfavourable. This was an act of overt discrimination.

The tribunal awarded Musguin £9,000 for injury to feelings.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

A Four-Day Working Week in the Construction Industry?

29 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMGSalary: £23,144 to £25,138 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and

The Open University – People ServicesSalary: £57,696 to £64,914 + up to £8,000 per annum MRP supplement* This provides summary information and comment on the

Cardiff UniversitySalary: Competitive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information

University of Oxford – Oxford Department of International DevelopmentSalary: £28,759 to £33,966 (Grade 5) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE