Search
Close this search box.

Both employers of investment bank traders vicariously liable for fraudulent trading

In Natwest Markets Plc and another v Bilta (UK) Ltd and others, the court ordered a re-trial, following a 19-month delay in the production of the original judgment. Separately, the court held that the individual wrongdoers were so much a part of the work, business and organisation of both defendant companies that it was just to make both employers answer for their tortious acts and omissions in the course of their employment.
dismissal

In Natwest Markets Plc and another v Bilta (UK) Ltd and others, the court ordered a re-trial, following a 19-month delay in the production of the original judgment. Separately, the court held that the individual wrongdoers were so much a part of the work, business and organisation of both defendant companies that it was just to make both employers answer for their tortious acts and omissions in the course of their employment.

The claim was brought by insolvent companies against a bank and its subsidiary for dishonest assistance and knowing participation in fraudulent trading, via the actions of its traders. It was established that the traders had been aware at all times that VAT was chargeable on their EU allowance carbon credit trades. Their evidence was untrue, implausible and designed to falsely suggest that there was no reason why they should have made the connection between the vast increase in trade that they were witnessing and the possibility that it was connected to VAT fraud.

The court rejected the argument made by the employer that the “loan” of the traders in this case was “so effective and complete that only [the host employer] should be held responsible for their tortious acts”. The court warned that it will be very rare to have circumstances giving rise to such a complete shift from the actual employer to the organization to which the employee is loaned. The court also noted that there has been no recorded case that has come to this conclusion.

The Court of Appeal ruled that it did not have faith that Judge Snowden J’s decisions were correct after he failed to address evidence that would potentially exonerate the traders.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Expert tips for spring cleaning CV and career

29 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMGSalary: £23,144 to £25,138 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and

The Open University – People ServicesSalary: £57,696 to £64,914 + up to £8,000 per annum MRP supplement* This provides summary information and comment on the

Cardiff UniversitySalary: Competitive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information

University of Oxford – Oxford Department of International DevelopmentSalary: £28,759 to £33,966 (Grade 5) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE