Search
Close this search box.

Test for assessing bad faith in victimisation claims is honesty not ulterior motive

Saad (S) when facing the likelihood that he would fail the assessment required to qualify as a surgeon, raised a grievance regarding a race discriminatory remark.
treasury

Under S.27 of the Equality Act 2010 an allegation of victimisation will not be protected if it is made in bad faith. In Saad v Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Saad (S) when facing the likelihood that he would fail the assessment required to qualify as a surgeon, raised a grievance regarding a race discriminatory remark. The ET held there were no reasonable grounds for S believing the allegation to be true but accepted that S had subjectively believed that it was. However, S had an ulterior motive, i.e. the assessment would be postponed, and the allegation had not been made in good faith. Therefore, as the allegation had been made in bad faith, his victimisation claim failed. The EAT upheld S’s appeal. The specific question raised by the bad faith requirement under S.27 is whether the Claimant had acted dishonestly. Motivation could be part of the relevant context but, in this case, the finding that S subjectively believed the allegation to be true was sufficient to counter the suggestion that he had acted in bad faith and his victimisation claim must be upheld.


This update provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented, and judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for more information. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Expert tips for spring cleaning CV and career

29 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMGSalary: £23,144 to £25,138 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and

The Open University – People ServicesSalary: £57,696 to £64,914 + up to £8,000 per annum MRP supplement* This provides summary information and comment on the

Cardiff UniversitySalary: Competitive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information

University of Oxford – Oxford Department of International DevelopmentSalary: £28,759 to £33,966 (Grade 5) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE