RSS Feed

Legal Updates

More Articles: Latest Popular Archives

Claimant’s belief in English nationalism not a protected philosophical belief

Makbool Javaid

In Uncles v National Health Service Commissioning Board and Ors , an ET dismissed Uncles’ (U) claim that he had been discriminated against because of his philosophical belief in English nationalism. The evidence showed that: (i) U had made posts on Facebook about “Banning the Burqa” and how a woman wearing a headscarf was not welcome in the UK; and (ii) had posted a number of Tweets which included comments about Islam being only for the insane, including using the hashtag “#RemoveAllMuslims”. U also told the ET that Islam in its current form needs to banned unless it is “Anglicised” and “toned down.” The ET concluded that U’s philosophical belief in English nationalism was not a protected characteristic under S.10(2) of the Equality Act 2010 because elements of it were incompatible with the fundamental rights guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights.


This update provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for more information.  Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.

Receive more HR related news and content with our monthly Enewsletter (Ebrief)