Search
Close this search box.

Test for whether suitable alternative employment is reasonable

Devon Primary Care Trust v Readman is a Court of Appeal decision which confirms

Devon Primary Care Trust v Readman is a Court of Appeal decision which confirms the test to be applied to determine whether an employee has unreasonably refused suitable alternative employment in a redundancy situation.

Readman (R) was offered the role of “modern matron” as an alternative to being made redundant. R rejected the job on the ground that her career path and qualifications were in community nursing. She had not worked in a hospital since 1985 and did not wish to do so. R also openly acknowledged that she wanted to emigrate to Canada. The tribunal decided that the alternative job was suitable because the only difference from the redundant job would be that 45% of the duties as a community matron would be replaced by 45% as a hospital matron and her skills were transferable. R’s refusal was therefore unreasonable, primarily because she had not given careful consideration to the differences between the two jobs, but also because it was “against her desire to emigrate”.

The Court of Appeal ruled that while the tribunal had identified the correct test, “the reasonableness or otherwise of the refusal depends on factors personal to the employee and is assessed subjectively from the employee's point of view” it had erred in applying it. The tribunal had failed to address R’s central argument, i.e. that, having spent 30 years working out in the community, it was not unreasonable to decline to work in a hospital. Furthermore, the tribunal had failed to address the relevance of R’s emigration plans. The vague statement that it had been “against her desire to emigrate” had been insufficient. Here, the issue the tribunal should have explored was whether her desire to emigrate had clouded her assessment of the job offer. The Court of Appeal stressed that the question of whether refusal of suitable alternative employment was reasonable would depend on the particular situation of the employee in question. There was no scope to apply a band of reasonable responses test.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Expert tips for spring cleaning CV and career

29 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMGSalary: £23,144 to £25,138 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and

The Open University – People ServicesSalary: £57,696 to £64,914 + up to £8,000 per annum MRP supplement* This provides summary information and comment on the

Cardiff UniversitySalary: Competitive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information

University of Oxford – Oxford Department of International DevelopmentSalary: £28,759 to £33,966 (Grade 5) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered.

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE