Search
Close this search box.

Dismissal due to post-natal depression was not discrimination

In Lyons v DWP/Jobcentre Plus, Lyons developed post-natal depression following the birth of her child

In Lyons v DWP/Jobcentre Plus, Lyons developed post-natal depression following the birth of her child. She decided not to take her full period of maternity leave and was due to return to work on 17 September, but her GP said she would not be fit to return until 14 October because of her depressive state. She remained unwell and by the following January thought she might be able to come back to work part-time, but she was dismissed. A tribunal, however, rejected her direct sex and pregnancy/maternity discrimination claims.

As far as direct discrimination was concerned, ECJ case law was quite clear that: (i) in the case of an illness manifesting itself after the maternity leave, there is no reason to distinguish an illness attributable to pregnancy or confinement from any other illness; and (ii) even where the illness starts during pregnancy or maternity leave, any absence after maternity leave is to be treated in the same way as a man's absence, of the same duration, due to incapacity to work. As a man would have been treated in the same way, there was no direct sex discrimination.

In considering the direct pregnancy/maternity discrimination provisions as set out in S.18 of the Equality Act 2010, then by being dismissed for post-natal depression, Lyons had been treated unfavourably due to a pregnancy-related illness. But, S.18 can only apply to any discrimination which occurs in the period between the start of pregnancy and up until, and including, the last day of maternity leave. Therefore, as Lyons had given an early date for return, but had failed to return on the due date, her maternity leave had ended and S.18 could not apply.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Myths surrounding AI in the recruitment industry busted

24 April 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of NorthamptonSalary: £44,263 to £54,395 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court

HR Director – Interim – 9 month FTC – London – Hybrid – £100,000 – £120,000 A dynamic, global financial services business with offices based

University of Bristol – Human ResourcesSalary: £26,444 to £29,605 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Queen Mary University of London – Human ResourcesSalary: £31,421 to £38,165 per annum inclusive of London Allowance This provides summary information and comment on the

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE