Search
Close this search box.

No transfer where client’s identity changed

In Hunter v McCarrick the EAT held that where there was a change of contractors, there was no service provision change under TUPE 2006 where the activities carried out before and after the change were carried out on behalf of different clients.

In Hunter v McCarrick the EAT held that where there was a change of contractors, there was no service provision change under TUPE 2006 where the activities carried out before and after the change were carried out on behalf of different clients.

One of the circumstances in which a service provision change takes place under TUPE 2006 is where the activities cease to be carried out by a contractor on ‘a client’s behalf‘and are reassigned to another contractor to carry out on ‘the client’s behalf’ (Reg 3(1)(b)(ii)).

Mr McCarrick was employed by Mr Hunter to manage a property portfolio for WCP on behalf of a client, WG Ltd. Aviva, the mortgagee, appointed receivers to control the properties and King Sturge to manage them. This meant that the services carried out by WCP on WGL’s behalf ceased and were instead carried out by King Sturge on Aviva’s/the receivers’ behalf. When he was dismissed, Mr McCarrick, brought a claim against Mr Hunter, who argued that he did not have sufficient service as there was no TUPE transfer when the change of contractors and change of clients took place.

The tribunal disagreed with Mr Hunter, holding that TUPE applied, but the EAT held that the tribunal were wrong. For Reg 3(1)(b)(ii) to apply, ‘a client’ on behalf of whom the services were being carried out before the transfer had to be ‘the client’ for whom the services were being carried out after the transfer. Therefore, although the contractor may change, the services had to be provided to the same client and so TUPE did not apply.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

The 3 challenges leaders face when seeking outcomes at pace

28 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099) This provides summary information

Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE