Search
Close this search box.

Correct comparator is a non-disabled person in the same circumstances

Correct comparator is a non-disabled person in the same circumstances

In Hose Express Thurrock Ltd v Jacomb, the EAT have provided further confirmation that the correct comparator test in disability-related direct discrimination claims is that set out in Lewisham Council v Malcolm and that an appropriate comparator is somebody who was in the same circumstances as the claimant but who was not disabled.

Following a long absence from work, following surgery, Mr Jacomb resigned. He could not agree a return-to-work date with Hose Express and the duties he would actually perform when he did come back. The disagreement escalated into a full scale argument, culminating in his resignation. The tribunal, following the comparator test set out by the Court of Appeal in Clark v Novacold [1999] IRLR 318, the precedent to be followed at the time, found that Mr Jacomb suffered disability discrimination and was constructively dismissed. The comparator the tribunal used was a non-disabled person who was at work.

The EAT upheld the employer’s appeal. The subsequent decision of the House of Lords in Lewisham Council v Malcolm [2008] IRLR 700, albeit a housing case, applied in that that the correct comparator was a non-disabled person in exactly the same circumstances as the disabled person. This meant that the appropriate comparator in this case was a non-disabled person who had been absent from work for 4 months and who had been undergoing treatment. If that comparator would have been treated in the same way, no discrimination had occurred.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Rise in recruitment fraud must urgently be checked

28 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099) This provides summary information

Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE